Efficiently Computing Compact Formal Explanations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Building on VeriX (Verified eXplainability, arXiv:2212.01051), a system for producing optimal verified explanations for machine learning models, we present VeriX+, which significantly improves both the size and the generation time of formal explanations. We introduce a bound propagation-based sensitivity technique to improve the size, and a binary search-based traversal with confidence ranking for improving time -- the two techniques are orthogonal and can be used independently or together. We also show how to adapt the QuickXplain algorithm to our setting to provide a trade-off between size and time. Experimental evaluations on standard benchmarks demonstrate significant improvements on both metrics, e.g., a size reduction of 38% on the GTSRB dataset and a time reduction of 90% on MNIST. We demonstrate that our approach is scalable to transformers and real-world scenarios such as autonomous aircraft taxiing and sentiment analysis. We conclude by showcasing several novel applications of formal explanations.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2024.
Builds on
18 of 33 references.
References · 18
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
- 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
- 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 739
- 2018Why ReLU networks yield high-confidence predictions far away from the training data and how to mitigate the problemcited by 323
- 2021Beta-CROWN: Efficient Bound Propagation with Per-neuron Split Constraints for Complete and Incomplete Neural Network Robustness Verificationcited by 224
- 2018Abduction-Based Explanations for Machine Learning Modelscited by 159
- 2018A Symbolic Approach to Explaining Bayesian Network Classifierscited by 130
6 more
- 2020On The Reasons Behind Decisionscited by 99
- 2024Marabou 2.0: A Versatile Formal Analyzer of Neural Networkscited by 81
- 2021PRIMA: General and Precise Neural Network Certification via Scalable Convex Hull Approximationscited by 77
- 2021On Guaranteed Optimal Robust Explanations for NLP Modelscited by 54
- 2024Distance-Restricted Explanations: Theoretical Underpinnings & Efficient Implementationcited by 20
- 2020Validation of Image-Based Neural Network Controllers through Adaptive Stress Testingcited by 19
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2024Efficient Contrastive Explanations on Demandcited by 1
- 2025Fixed Point Explainabilitycited by 0
- 2026Beyond L2: Generalizing Abductive Latent Explanations to Diverse Prototype-Based Architecturescited by 0
- 2026Neuron Activation-based Computation of Logical Explanations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2026Neuron Activation-based Computation of Logical Explanations for Deep Neural Networks12 Sep 2026
- 2026Beyond L2: Generalizing Abductive Latent Explanations to Diverse Prototype-Based Architectures17 Aug 2026
- 2025Fixed Point Explainability18 May 2025
- 2024Efficient Contrastive Explanations on Demand24 Dec 2024