mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Governing dual-use technologies: Case studies of international security agreements and lessons for AI governance

arXiv 2409.02779 ↗First posted 4 Sep 2024cs.CY cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

International AI governance agreements and institutions may play an important role in reducing global security risks from advanced AI. To inform the design of such agreements and institutions, we conducted case studies of historical and contemporary international security agreements. We focused specifically on those arrangements around dual-use technologies, examining agreements in nuclear security, chemical weapons, biosecurity, and export controls. For each agreement, we examined four key areas: (a) purpose, (b) core powers, (c) governance structure, and (d) instances of non-compliance. From these case studies, we extracted lessons for the design of international AI agreements and governance institutions. We discuss the importance of robust verification methods, strategies for balancing power between nations, mechanisms for adapting to rapid technological change, approaches to managing trade-offs between transparency and security, incentives for participation, and effective enforcement mechanisms.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 68 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Sep 2024.

Builds on

2 of 68 references.

References · 2

  1. 2023International Governance of Civilian AI: A Jurisdictional Certification Approachcited by 8
  2. 2024Affirmative safety: An approach to risk management for high-risk AIcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.