Logit Scaling for Out-of-Distribution Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The safe deployment of machine learning and AI models in open-world settings hinges critically on the ability to detect out-of-distribution (OOD) data accurately, data samples that contrast vastly from what the model was trained with. Current approaches to OOD detection often require further training the model, and/or statistics about the training data which may no longer be accessible. Additionally, many existing OOD detection methods struggle to maintain performance when transferred across different architectures. Our research tackles these issues by proposing a simple, post-hoc method that does not require access to the training data distribution, keeps a trained network intact, and holds strong performance across a variety of architectures. Our method, Logit Scaling (LTS), as the name suggests, simply scales the logits in a manner that effectively distinguishes between in-distribution (ID) and OOD samples. We tested our method on benchmarks across various scales, including CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, ImageNet and OpenOOD. The experiments cover 3 ID and 14 OOD datasets, as well as 9 model architectures. Overall, we demonstrate state-of-the-art performance, robustness and adaptability across different architectures, paving the way towards a universally applicable solution for advanced OOD detection.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2024.
Builds on
28 of 37 references.
References · 28
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
- 2016A Baseline for Detecting Misclassified and Out-of-Distribution Examples in Neural Networkscited by 2,362
- 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,110
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
- 2018A Simple Unified Framework for Detecting Out-of-Distribution Samples and Adversarial Attackscited by 1,472
- 2021MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Visioncited by 1,441
- 2015LSUN: Construction of a Large-scale Image Dataset using Deep Learning with Humans in the Loopcited by 1,350
16 more
- 2017Enhancing The Reliability of Out-of-distribution Image Detection in Neural Networkscited by 1,325
- 2020Energy-based Out-of-distribution Detectioncited by 1,296
- 2014Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Imagescited by 774
- 2022Out-of-Distribution Detection with Deep Nearest Neighborscited by 596
- 2021ReAct: Out-of-distribution Detection With Rectified Activationscited by 486
- 2022ViM: Out-Of-Distribution with Virtual-logit Matchingcited by 404
- 2021Open-Set Recognition: a Good Closed-Set Classifier is All You Need?cited by 351
- 2021Unsolved Problems in ML Safetycited by 291
- 2022Mitigating Neural Network Overconfidence with Logit Normalizationcited by 251
- 2022Extremely Simple Activation Shaping for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 212
- 2023OpenOOD v1.5: Enhanced Benchmark for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 178
- 2021DICE: Leveraging Sparsification for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 166
- 2015TurkerGaze: Crowdsourcing Saliency with Webcam based Eye Trackingcited by 165
- 2023In or Out? Fixing ImageNet Out-of-Distribution Detection Evaluationcited by 132
- 2023Scaling for Training Time and Post-hoc Out-of-distribution Detection Enhancementcited by 77
- 2024Towards Optimal Feature-Shaping Methods for Out-of-Distribution Detectioncited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.