Hound: Hunting Supervision Signals for Few and Zero Shot Node Classification on Text-attributed Graph
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Text-attributed graph (TAG) is an important type of graph structured data with text descriptions for each node. Few- and zero-shot node classification on TAGs have many applications in fields such as academia and social networks. However, the two tasks are challenging due to the lack of supervision signals, and existing methods only use the contrastive loss to align graph-based node embedding and language-based text embedding. In this paper, we propose Hound to improve accuracy by introducing more supervision signals, and the core idea is to go beyond the node-text pairs that come with data. Specifically, we design three augmentation techniques, i.e., node perturbation, text matching, and semantics negation to provide more reference nodes for each text and vice versa. Node perturbation adds/drops edges to produce diversified node embeddings that can be matched with a text. Text matching retrieves texts with similar embeddings to match with a node. Semantics negation uses a negative prompt to construct a negative text with the opposite semantics, which is contrasted with the original node and text. We evaluate Hound on 5 datasets and compare with 13 state-of-the-art baselines. The results show that Hound consistently outperforms all baselines, and its accuracy improvements over the best-performing baseline are usually over 5%.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Sep 2024.
Builds on
27 of 44 references.
References · 27
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,482
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
- 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,861
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
- 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
- 2019Simplifying Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,470
- 2016Variational Graph Auto-Encoderscited by 1,373
- 2020Graph Contrastive Learning with Augmentationscited by 1,203
15 more
- 2018Deep Graph Infomaxcited by 1,101
- 2021P-Tuning v2: Prompt Tuning Can Be Comparable to Fine-tuning Universally Across Scales and Taskscited by 686
- 2022GraphMAE: Self-Supervised Masked Graph Autoencoderscited by 443
- 2018Graph Convolutional Networks for Text Classificationcited by 345
- 2020GPT-GNN: Generative Pre-Training of Graph Neural Networkscited by 302
- 2022Learning on Large-scale Text-attributed Graphs via Variational Inferencecited by 153
- 2021GraphFormers: GNN-nested Transformers for Representation Learning on Textual Graphcited by 143
- 2019Knowledge Graph Convolutional Networks for Recommender Systemscited by 121
- 2019Meta-GNN: On Few-shot Node Classification in Graph Meta-learningcited by 105
- 2023Augmenting Low-Resource Text Classification with Graph-Grounded Pre-training and Promptingcited by 62
- 2022Task-Adaptive Few-shot Node Classificationcited by 43
- 2023Prompt-based Node Feature Extractor for Few-shot Learning on Text-Attributed Graphscited by 23
- 2020Enhancing Social Recommendation with Adversarial Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 16
- 2021Zero-shot Node Classification with Decomposed Graph Prototype Networkcited by 15
- 2024Pre-Training and Prompting for Few-Shot Node Classification on Text-Attributed Graphscited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.