Negation Blindness in Large Language Models: Unveiling the NO Syndrome in Image Generation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Foundational Large Language Models (LLMs) have changed the way we perceive technology. They have been shown to excel in tasks ranging from poem writing and coding to essay generation and puzzle solving. With the incorporation of image generation capability, they have become more comprehensive and versatile AI tools. At the same time, researchers are striving to identify the limitations of these tools to improve them further. Currently identified flaws include hallucination, biases, and bypassing restricted commands to generate harmful content. In the present work, we have identified a fundamental limitation related to the image generation ability of LLMs, and termed it The NO Syndrome. This negation blindness refers to LLMs inability to correctly comprehend NO related natural language prompts to generate the desired images. Interestingly, all tested LLMs including GPT-4, Gemini, and Copilot were found to be suffering from this syndrome. To demonstrate the generalization of this limitation, we carried out simulation experiments and conducted entropy-based and benchmark statistical analysis tests on various LLMs in multiple languages, including English, Hindi, and French. We conclude that the NO syndrome is a significant flaw in current LLMs that needs to be addressed. A related finding of this study showed a consistent discrepancy between image and textual responses as a result of this NO syndrome. We posit that the introduction of a negation context-aware reinforcement learning based feedback loop between the LLMs textual response and generated image could help ensure the generated text is based on both the LLMs correct contextual understanding of the negation query and the generated visual output.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2024.
Builds on
13 of 33 references.
References · 13
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2023CogAgent: A Visual Language Model for GUI Agentscited by 692
- 2023Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Practice: A Survey on ChatGPT and Beyondcited by 409
- 2023A Survey on Multimodal Large Language Models for Autonomous Drivingcited by 288
- 2024A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination Mitigation Techniques in Large Language Modelscited by 266
- 2021Large Pre-trained Language Models Contain Human-like Biases of What is Right and Wrong to Docited by 178
- 2024The Ethics of ChatGPT in Medicine and Healthcare: A Systematic Review on Large Language Models (LLMs)cited by 45
- 2023Sparks of Large Audio Models: A Survey and Outlookcited by 41
- 2024XAI meets LLMs: A Survey of the Relation between Explainable AI and Large Language Modelscited by 23
- 2023Decoding ChatGPT: A Taxonomy of Existing Research, Current Challenges, and Possible Future Directionscited by 18
- 2023Refashioning Emotion Recognition Modelling: The Advent of Generalised Large Modelscited by 16
1 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2.
3 papers.