mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

No Need to Sacrifice Data Quality for Quantity: Crowd-Informed Machine Annotation for Cost-Effective Understanding of Visual Data

arXiv 2409.00048 ↗First posted 19 Aug 2024cs.HC cs.CV cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Labeling visual data is expensive and time-consuming. Crowdsourcing systems promise to enable highly parallelizable annotations through the participation of monetarily or otherwise motivated workers, but even this approach has its limits. The solution: replace manual work with machine work. But how reliable are machine annotators? Sacrificing data quality for high throughput cannot be acceptable, especially in safety-critical applications such as autonomous driving. In this paper, we present a framework that enables quality checking of visual data at large scales without sacrificing the reliability of the results. We ask annotators simple questions with discrete answers, which can be highly automated using a convolutional neural network trained to predict crowd responses. Unlike the methods of previous work, which aim to directly predict soft labels to address human uncertainty, we use per-task posterior distributions over soft labels as our training objective, leveraging a Dirichlet prior for analytical accessibility. We demonstrate our approach on two challenging real-world automotive datasets, showing that our model can fully automate a significant portion of tasks, saving costs in the high double-digit percentage range. Our model reliably predicts human uncertainty, allowing for more accurate inspection and filtering of difficult examples. Additionally, we show that the posterior distributions over soft labels predicted by our model can be used as priors in further inference processes, reducing the need for numerous human labelers to approximate true soft labels accurately. This results in further cost reductions and more efficient use of human resources in the annotation process.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Aug 2024.

Builds on

16 of 33 references.

References · 16

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  4. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  5. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  6. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  7. 2021Unsolved Problems in ML Safetycited by 291
  8. 2022Mitigating Neural Network Overconfidence with Logit Normalizationcited by 251
  9. 2019Human uncertainty makes classification more robustcited by 231
  10. 2017Deep learning from crowdscited by 105
  11. 2018The EuroCity Persons Dataset: A Novel Benchmark for Object Detectioncited by 56
  12. 2019The Mapillary Traffic Sign Dataset for Detection and Classification on a Global Scalecited by 49
4 more
  1. 2022Eliciting and Learning with Soft Labels from Every Annotatorcited by 43
  2. 2019On the adequacy of untuned warmup for adaptive optimizationcited by 35
  3. 2021A survey of image labelling for computer vision applicationscited by 18
  4. 2018Classifying a specific image region using convolutional nets with an ROI mask as inputcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.