mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

A Deep-Learning-Based Label-free No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Metric: Application in Sodium MRI Denoising

arXiv 2408.16481 ↗First posted 29 Aug 2024eess.IV cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

New multinuclear MRI techniques, such as sodium MRI, generally suffer from low image quality due to an inherently low signal. Postprocessing methods, such as image denoising, have been developed for image enhancement. However, the assessment of these enhanced images is challenging especially considering when there is a lack of high resolution and high signal images as reference, such as in sodium MRI. No-reference Image Quality Assessment (NR-IQA) metrics are approaches to solve this problem. Existing learning-based NR-IQA metrics rely on labels derived from subjective human opinions or metrics like Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), which are either time-consuming or lack accurate ground truths, resulting in unreliable assessment. We note that deep learning (DL) models have a unique characteristic in that they are specialized to a characteristic training set, meaning that deviations between the input testing data from the training data will reduce prediction accuracy. Therefore, we propose a novel DL-based NR-IQA metric, the Model Specialization Metric (MSM), which does not depend on ground-truth images or labels. MSM measures the difference between the input image and the model's prediction for evaluating the quality of the input image. Experiments conducted on both simulated distorted proton T1-weighted MR images and denoised sodium MR images demonstrate that MSM exhibits a superior evaluation performance on various simulated noises and distortions. MSM also has a substantial agreement with the expert evaluations, achieving an averaged Cohen's Kappa coefficient of 0.6528, outperforming the existing NR-IQA metrics.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2024.

Builds on

15 of 45 references.

References · 15

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
  4. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  5. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
  6. 2018The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Deep Features as a Perceptual Metriccited by 11,177
  7. 2016Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolutioncited by 2,694
  8. 2021SwinIR: Image Restoration Using Swin Transformercited by 1,887
  9. 2016Beyond a Gaussian Denoiser: Residual Learning of Deep CNN for Image Denoisingcited by 1,358
  10. 2021MUSIQ: Multi-scale Image Quality Transformercited by 1,081
  11. 2020Image Quality Assessment: Unifying Structure and Texture Similaritycited by 811
  12. 2019KonIQ-10k: An ecologically valid database for deep learning of blind image quality assessmentcited by 355
3 more
  1. 2017Road Extraction by Deep Residual U-Netcited by 333
  2. 2016Deep Neural Networks for No-Reference and Full-Reference Image Quality Assessmentcited by 225
  3. 2019From Patches to Pictures (PaQ-2-PiQ): Mapping the Perceptual Space of Picture Qualitycited by 223

Built on by

Not cited yet.