mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Adversarial Network Optimization under Bandit Feedback: Maximizing Utility in Non-Stationary Multi-Hop Networks

arXiv 2408.16215 ↗First posted 29 Aug 2024math.OC cs.LG cs.PFcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Stochastic Network Optimization (SNO) concerns scheduling in stochastic queueing systems. It has been widely studied in network theory. Classical SNO algorithms require network conditions to be stationary with time, which fails to capture the non-stationary components in many real-world scenarios. Many existing algorithms also assume knowledge of network conditions before decision, which rules out applications where unpredictability presents. Motivated by these issues, we consider Adversarial Network Optimization (ANO) under bandit feedback. Specifically, we consider the task of *i)* maximizing some unknown and time-varying utility function associated to scheduler's actions, where *ii)* the underlying network is a non-stationary multi-hop one whose conditions change arbitrarily with time, and *iii)* only bandit feedback (effect of actually deployed actions) is revealed after decisions. Our proposed `UMO2` algorithm ensures network stability and also matches the utility maximization performance of any "mildly varying" reference policy up to a polynomially decaying gap. To our knowledge, no previous ANO algorithm handled multi-hop networks or achieved utility guarantees under bandit feedback, whereas ours can do both. Technically, our method builds upon a novel integration of online learning into Lyapunov analyses: To handle complex inter-dependencies among queues in multi-hop networks, we propose meticulous techniques to balance online learning and Lyapunov arguments. To tackle the learning obstacles due to potentially unbounded queue sizes, we design a new online linear optimization algorithm that automatically adapts to loss magnitudes. To maximize utility, we propose a bandit convex optimization algorithm with novel queue-dependent learning rate scheduling that suites drastically varying queue lengths. Our new insights in online learning can be of independent interest.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2024.

Builds on

12 of 51 references.

References · 12

  1. 2019Bandit Convex Optimization in Non-stationary Environmentscited by 41
  2. 2020Queueing Network Controls via Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
  3. 2017Bandit Convex Optimization for Scalable and Dynamic IoT Managementcited by 24
  4. 2016Learning Unknown Service Rates in Queues: A Multi-Armed Bandit Approachcited by 18
  5. 2015A Survey on Wireless Security: Technical Challenges, Recent Advances and Future Trendscited by 16
  6. 2020RL-QN: A Reinforcement Learning Framework for Optimal Control of Queueing Systemscited by 11
  7. 2021Job Dispatching Policies for Queueing Systems with Unknown Service Ratescited by 11
  8. 2018Augmenting Max-Weight with Explicit Learning for Wireless Scheduling with Switching Costscited by 9
  9. 2019Equipping Experts/Bandits with Long-term Memorycited by 9
  10. 2023Sample Efficient Reinforcement Learning in Mixed Systems through Augmented Samples and Its Applications to Queueing Networkscited by 9
  11. 2022Learning While Scheduling in Multi-Server Systems with Unknown Statistics: MaxWeight with Discounted UCBcited by 8
  12. 2017Network Utility Maximization in Adversarial Environmentscited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.