Revisit Micro-batch Clipping: Adaptive Data Pruning via Gradient Manipulation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Micro-batch clipping, a gradient clipping method, has recently shown potential in enhancing auto-speech recognition (ASR) model performance. However, the underlying mechanism behind this improvement remains mysterious, particularly the observation that only certain micro-batch sizes are beneficial. In this paper, we make the first attempt to explain this phenomenon. Inspired by recent data pruning research, we assume that specific training samples may impede model convergence during certain training phases. Under this assumption, the convergence analysis shows that micro-batch clipping can improve the convergence rate asymptotically at the cost of an additional constant bias that does not diminish with more training iterations. The bias is dependent on a few factors and can be minimized at specific micro-batch size, thereby elucidating the existence of the sweet-spot micro-batch size observed previously. We also verify the effectiveness of micro-batch clipping beyond speech models on vision and language models, and show promising performance gains in these domains. An exploration of potential limitations shows that micro-batch clipping is less effective when training data originates from multiple distinct domains.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Aug 2024.
Builds on
20 of 28 references.
References · 20
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
- 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2020Conformer: Convolution-augmented Transformer for Speech Recognitioncited by 1,838
- 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,718
- 2018An Empirical Study of Example Forgetting during Deep Neural Network Learningcited by 669
- 2021Deep Learning on a Data Diet: Finding Important Examples Early in Trainingcited by 529
- 2022Beyond neural scaling laws: beating power law scaling via data pruningcited by 519
- 2019Libri-Light: A Benchmark for ASR with Limited or No Supervisioncited by 462
- 2022Self-supervised Learning with Random-projection Quantizer for Speech Recognitioncited by 158
- 2023How to DP-fy ML: A Practical Guide to Machine Learning with Differential Privacycited by 150
- 2020Understanding Gradient Clipping in Private SGD: A Geometric Perspectivecited by 140
8 more
- 2022Automatic Clipping: Differentially Private Deep Learning Made Easier and Strongercited by 87
- 2018A General Approach to Adding Differential Privacy to Iterative Training Procedurescited by 84
- 2021Mind Your Outliers! Investigating the Negative Impact of Outliers on Active Learning for Visual Question Answeringcited by 62
- 2019Semantic Redundancies in Image-Classification Datasets: The 10% You Don't Needcited by 43
- 2021Active Learning at the ImageNet Scalecited by 28
- 2024DRoP: Distributionally Robust Data Pruningcited by 7
- 2023Unintended Memorization in Large ASR Models, and How to Mitigate Itcited by 5
- 2024Efficiently Train ASR Models that Memorize Less and Perform Better with Per-core Clippingcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.