Unintended Memorization in Large ASR Models, and How to Mitigate It
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
It is well-known that neural networks can unintentionally memorize their training examples, causing privacy concerns. However, auditing memorization in large non-auto-regressive automatic speech recognition (ASR) models has been challenging due to the high compute cost of existing methods such as hardness calibration. In this work, we design a simple auditing method to measure memorization in large ASR models without the extra compute overhead. Concretely, we speed up randomly-generated utterances to create a mapping between vocal and text information that is difficult to learn from typical training examples. Hence, accurate predictions only for sped-up training examples can serve as clear evidence for memorization, and the corresponding accuracy can be used to measure memorization. Using the proposed method, we showcase memorization in the state-of-the-art ASR models. To mitigate memorization, we tried gradient clipping during training to bound the influence of any individual example on the final model. We empirically show that clipping each example's gradient can mitigate memorization for sped-up training examples with up to 16 repetitions in the training set. Furthermore, we show that in large-scale distributed training, clipping the average gradient on each compute core maintains neutral model quality and compute cost while providing strong privacy protection.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Oct 2023.
Builds on
17 of 22 references.
References · 17
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2018The Secret Sharer: Evaluating and Testing Unintended Memorization in Neural Networkscited by 847
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 839
- 2022Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Modelscited by 755
- 2023Extracting Training Data from Diffusion Modelscited by 723
- 2019Libri-Light: A Benchmark for ASR with Limited or No Supervisioncited by 462
- 2017Parallel WaveNet: Fast High-Fidelity Speech Synthesiscited by 214
- 2020Pushing the Limits of Semi-Supervised Learning for Automatic Speech Recognitioncited by 185
- 2022Self-supervised Learning with Random-projection Quantizer for Speech Recognitioncited by 158
- 2023How to DP-fy ML: A Practical Guide to Machine Learning with Differential Privacycited by 150
- 2022Reconstructing Training Data with Informed Adversariescited by 143
- 2022Measuring Forgetting of Memorized Training Examplescited by 118
5 more
- 2022Truth Serum: Poisoning Machine Learning Models to Reveal Their Secretscited by 94
- 2023Why Is Public Pretraining Necessary for Private Model Training?cited by 36
- 2022Detecting Unintended Memorization in Language-Model-Fused ASRcited by 9
- 2021A Method to Reveal Speaker Identity in Distributed ASR Training, and How to Counter Itcited by 8
- 2022Extracting Targeted Training Data from ASR Models, and How to Mitigate Itcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
5 papers.
- 2025Attacker's Noise Can Manipulate Your Audio-based LLM in the Real Worldcited by 8
- 2025Multimodal Conversation Structure Understandingcited by 4
- 2024Training Large ASR Encoders with Differential Privacycited by 2
- 2024Revisit Micro-batch Clipping: Adaptive Data Pruning via Gradient Manipulationcited by 0
- 2026Evaluating Machine Unlearning in ASRcited by 0
- 2026Evaluating Machine Unlearning in ASR28 Sep 2026
- 2025Attacker's Noise Can Manipulate Your Audio-based LLM in the Real World7 Jul 2025
- 2025Multimodal Conversation Structure Understanding23 May 2025
- 2024Training Large ASR Encoders with Differential Privacy21 Sep 2024
- 2024Revisit Micro-batch Clipping: Adaptive Data Pruning via Gradient Manipulation29 Aug 2024