mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Conan-embedding: General Text Embedding with More and Better Negative Samples

arXiv 2408.15710 ↗First posted 28 Aug 2024cs.CLcited by 15

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the growing popularity of RAG, the capabilities of embedding models are gaining increasing attention. Embedding models are primarily trained through contrastive loss learning, with negative examples being a key component. Previous work has proposed various hard negative mining strategies, but these strategies are typically employed as preprocessing steps. In this paper, we propose the conan-embedding model, which maximizes the utilization of more and higher-quality negative examples. Specifically, since the model's ability to handle preprocessed negative examples evolves during training, we propose dynamic hard negative mining method to expose the model to more challenging negative examples throughout the training process. Secondly, contrastive learning requires as many negative examples as possible but is limited by GPU memory constraints. Therefore, we use a Cross-GPU balancing Loss to provide more negative examples for embedding training and balance the batch size across multiple tasks. Moreover, we also discovered that the prompt-response pairs from LLMs can be used for embedding training. Our approach effectively enhances the capabilities of embedding models, currently ranking first on the Chinese leaderboard of Massive text embedding benchmark

Key facts. Cited by 15 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Aug 2024.

Builds on

11 of 17 references.

References · 11

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019ZeRO: Memory Optimizations Toward Training Trillion Parameter Modelscited by 1,278
  3. 2022Text Embeddings by Weakly-Supervised Contrastive Pre-trainingcited by 1,216
  4. 2023Towards General Text Embeddings with Multi-stage Contrastive Learningcited by 705
  5. 2022MTEB: Massive Text Embedding Benchmarkcited by 623
  6. 2024InternLM2 Technical Reportcited by 391
  7. 2022One Embedder, Any Task: Instruction-Finetuned Text Embeddingscited by 329
  8. 2023Improving Text Embeddings with Large Language Modelscited by 295
  9. 2022Matryoshka Representation Learningcited by 268
  10. 2024NV-Retriever: Improving text embedding models with effective hard-negative miningcited by 83
  11. 2023Challenging Decoder helps in Masked Auto-Encoder Pre-training for Dense Passage Retrievalcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 10; 2026: 3.

15 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Improve Multi-Modal Embedding Learning via Explicit Hard Negative Gradient Amplifying
  2. 2024Recent advances in text embedding: A Comprehensive Review of Top-Performing Methods on the MTEB Benchmark
  3. 2024GISTEmbed: Guided In-sample Selection of Training Negatives for Text Embedding Fine-tuning
  4. 2024ReNeg: Learning Negative Embedding with Reward Guidance
  5. 2024Jasper and Stella: distillation of SOTA embedding models
  6. 2025Training Sparse Mixture Of Experts Text Embedding Models
  7. 2024Enhancing Retrieval Performance: An Ensemble Approach For Hard Negative Mining
  8. 2026Zero2Text: Zero-Training Cross-Domain Inversion Attacks on Textual Embeddings