mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Intertwined Biases Across Social Media Spheres: Unpacking Correlations in Media Bias Dimensions

arXiv 2408.15406 ↗First posted 27 Aug 2024cs.SI cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Media bias significantly shapes public perception by reinforcing stereotypes and exacerbating societal divisions. Prior research has often focused on isolated media bias dimensions such as textitpolitical bias or textitracial bias, neglecting the complex interrelationships among various bias dimensions across different topic domains. Moreover, we observe that models trained on existing media bias benchmarks fail to generalize effectively on recent social media posts, particularly in certain bias identification tasks. This shortfall primarily arises because these benchmarks do not adequately reflect the rapidly evolving nature of social media content, which is characterized by shifting user behaviors and emerging trends. In response to these limitations, our research introduces a novel dataset collected from YouTube and Reddit over the past five years. Our dataset includes automated annotations for YouTube content across a broad spectrum of bias dimensions, such as gender, racial, and political biases, as well as hate speech, among others. It spans diverse domains including politics, sports, healthcare, education, and entertainment, reflecting the complex interplay of biases across different societal sectors. Through comprehensive statistical analysis, we identify significant differences in bias expression patterns and intra-domain bias correlations across these domains. By utilizing our understanding of the correlations among various bias dimensions, we lay the groundwork for creating advanced systems capable of detecting multiple biases simultaneously. Overall, our dataset advances the field of media bias identification, contributing to the development of tools that promote fairer media consumption. The comprehensive awareness of existing media bias fosters more ethical journalism, promotes cultural sensitivity, and supports a more informed and equitable public discourse.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2024.

Builds on

16 of 35 references.

References · 16

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  3. 2017Automated Hate Speech Detection and the Problem of Offensive Languagecited by 736
  4. 2020HateXplain: A Benchmark Dataset for Explainable Hate Speech Detectioncited by 407
  5. 2017"Liar, Liar Pants on Fire": A New Benchmark Dataset for Fake News Detectioncited by 363
  6. 2017Learning to select data for transfer learning with Bayesian Optimizationcited by 64
  7. 2021Multi-Task Learning in Natural Language Processing: An Overviewcited by 62
  8. 2017Identifying beneficial task relations for multi-task learning in deep neural networkscited by 59
  9. 2022Dbias: Detecting biases and ensuring Fairness in news articlescited by 28
  10. 2023Introducing MBIB -- the first Media Bias Identification Benchmark Task and Dataset Collectioncited by 18
  11. 2023The Media Bias Taxonomy: A Systematic Literature Review on the Forms and Automated Detection of Media Biascited by 12
  12. 2022Exploiting Transformer-based Multitask Learning for the Detection of Media Bias in News Articlescited by 11
4 more
  1. 2022Why only Micro-F1? Class Weighting of Measures for Relation Classificationcited by 8
  2. 2021Mitigating Media Bias through Neutral Article Generationcited by 7
  3. 2021GradTS: A Gradient-Based Automatic Auxiliary Task Selection Method Based on Transformer Networkscited by 7
  4. 2024MAGPIE: Multi-Task Media-Bias Analysis Generalization for Pre-Trained Identification of Expressionscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.