mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Functional Trade-off between Prosodic and Semantic Cues in Conveying Sarcasm

arXiv 2408.14892 ↗First posted 27 Aug 2024cs.CL cs.SD eess.AScited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This study investigates the acoustic features of sarcasm and disentangles the interplay between the propensity of an utterance being used sarcastically and the presence of prosodic cues signaling sarcasm. Using a dataset of sarcastic utterances compiled from television shows, we analyze the prosodic features within utterances and key phrases belonging to three distinct sarcasm categories (embedded, propositional, and illocutionary), which vary in the degree of semantic cues present, and compare them to neutral expressions. Results show that in phrases where the sarcastic meaning is salient from the semantics, the prosodic cues are less relevant than when the sarcastic meaning is not evident from the semantics, suggesting a trade-off between prosodic and semantic cues of sarcasm at the phrase level. These findings highlight a lessened reliance on prosodic modulation in semantically dense sarcastic expressions and a nuanced interaction that shapes the communication of sarcastic intent.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Aug 2024.

Builds on

1 of 22 references.

References · 1

  1. 2022A Multimodal Corpus for Emotion Recognition in Sarcasmcited by 29

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.

5 papers.