mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Estimating Uncertainty with Implicit Quantile Network

arXiv 2408.14525 ↗First posted 26 Aug 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.NEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Uncertainty quantification is an important part of many performance critical applications. This paper provides a simple alternative to existing approaches such as ensemble learning and bayesian neural networks. By directly modeling the loss distribution with an Implicit Quantile Network, we get an estimate of how uncertain the model is of its predictions. For experiments with MNIST and CIFAR datasets, the mean of the estimated loss distribution is 2x higher for incorrect predictions. When data with high estimated uncertainty is removed from the test dataset, the accuracy of the model goes up as much as 10%. This method is simple to implement while offering important information to applications where the user has to know when the model could be wrong (e.g. deep learning for healthcare).

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 9 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2024.

Builds on

4 of 9 references.

References · 4

  1. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  2. 2013Playing Atari with Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 3,274
  3. 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,287
  4. 2018Implicit Quantile Networks for Distributional Reinforcement Learningcited by 369

Built on by

Not cited yet.