Prompt-Matcher: Leveraging Large Models to Reduce Uncertainty in Schema Matching Results
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Schema matching is the process of identifying correspondences between the elements of two given schemata, essential for database management systems, data integration, and data warehousing. For datasets across different scenarios, the optimal schema matching algorithm is different. For single algorithm, hyperparameter tuning also cases multiple results. All results assigned equal probabilities are stored in probabilistic databases to facilitate uncertainty management. The substantial degree of uncertainty diminishes the efficiency and reliability of data processing, thereby precluding the provision of more accurate information for decision-makers. To address this problem, we introduce a new approach based on fine-grained correspondence verification with specific prompt of Large Language Model. Our approach is an iterative loop that consists of three main components: (1) the correspondence selection algorithm, (2) correspondence verification, and (3) the update of probability distribution. The core idea is that correspondences intersect across multiple results, thereby linking the verification of correspondences to the reduction of uncertainty in candidate results. The task of selecting an optimal correspondence set to maximize the anticipated uncertainty reduction within a fixed budgetary framework is established as an NP-hard problem. We propose a novel (1-1/e)-approximation algorithm that significantly outperforms brute algorithm in terms of computational efficiency. To enhance correspondence verification, we have developed two prompt templates that enable GPT-4 to achieve state-of-the-art performance across two established benchmark datasets. Our comprehensive experimental evaluation demonstrates the superior effectiveness and robustness of the proposed approach.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Aug 2024.
Builds on
5 of 31 references.
References · 5
- 2023Do the Rewards Justify the Means? Measuring Trade-Offs Between Rewards and Ethical Behavior in the MACHIAVELLI Benchmarkcited by 174
- 2020Valentine: Evaluating Matching Techniques for Dataset Discoverycited by 34
- 2023Agent-OM: Leveraging LLM Agents for Ontology Matchingcited by 26
- 2024ReMatch: Retrieval Enhanced Schema Matching with LLMscited by 16
- 2018Reducing Uncertainty of Schema Matching via Crowdsourcing with Accuracy Ratescited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.