mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Estimating Causal Effects from Learned Causal Networks

arXiv 2408.14101 ↗First posted 26 Aug 2024cs.AI cs.LGcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The standard approach to answering an identifiable causal-effect query (e.g., P(Y|do(X)) when given a causal diagram and observational data is to first generate an estimand, or probabilistic expression over the observable variables, which is then evaluated using the observational data. In this paper, we propose an alternative paradigm for answering causal-effect queries over discrete observable variables. We propose to instead learn the causal Bayesian network and its confounding latent variables directly from the observational data. Then, efficient probabilistic graphical model (PGM) algorithms can be applied to the learned model to answer queries. Perhaps surprisingly, we show that this model completion learning approach can be more effective than estimand approaches, particularly for larger models in which the estimand expressions become computationally difficult. We illustrate our method's potential using a benchmark collection of Bayesian networks and synthetically generated causal models.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Aug 2024.

Builds on

7 of 37 references.

References · 7

  1. 2021The Causal-Neural Connection: Expressiveness, Learnability, and Inferencecited by 97
  2. 2021Partial Counterfactual Identification from Observational and Experimental Datacited by 64
  3. 2022Neural Causal Models for Counterfactual Identification and Estimationcited by 54
  4. 2013The Bayesian Structural EM Algorithmcited by 26
  5. 2020Semiparametric Inference For Causal Effects In Graphical Models With Hidden Variablescited by 23
  6. 2022Causal Inference Using Tractable Circuitscited by 12
  7. 2014Join-Graph Propagation Algorithmscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2.

3 papers.