Reduce, Reuse, Recycle: Categories for Compositional Reinforcement Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In reinforcement learning, conducting task composition by forming cohesive, executable sequences from multiple tasks remains challenging. However, the ability to (de)compose tasks is a linchpin in developing robotic systems capable of learning complex behaviors. Yet, compositional reinforcement learning is beset with difficulties, including the high dimensionality of the problem space, scarcity of rewards, and absence of system robustness after task composition. To surmount these challenges, we view task composition through the prism of category theory -- a mathematical discipline exploring structures and their compositional relationships. The categorical properties of Markov decision processes untangle complex tasks into manageable sub-tasks, allowing for strategical reduction of dimensionality, facilitating more tractable reward structures, and bolstering system robustness. Experimental results support the categorical theory of reinforcement learning by enabling skill reduction, reuse, and recycling when learning complex robotic arm tasks.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2024.
Builds on
25 of 49 references.
References · 25
- 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,635
- 2020robosuite: A Modular Simulation Framework and Benchmark for Robot Learningcited by 484
- 2018Data-Efficient Hierarchical Reinforcement Learningcited by 436
- 2016Learning Modular Neural Network Policies for Multi-Task and Multi-Robot Transfercited by 124
- 2021Compositional Reinforcement Learning from Logical Specificationscited by 65
- 2020A Boolean Task Algebra for Reinforcement Learningcited by 46
- 2021Categorical Foundations of Gradient-Based Learningcited by 44
- 2022Modular Lifelong Reinforcement Learning via Neural Compositioncited by 39
- 2018Exploration in Structured Reinforcement Learningcited by 34
- 2022Environment Generation for Zero-Shot Compositional Reinforcement Learningcited by 32
- 2022Misspecification in Inverse Reinforcement Learningcited by 27
- 2022CompoSuite: A Compositional Reinforcement Learning Benchmarkcited by 21
13 more
- 2021Solving Compositional Reinforcement Learning Problems via Task Reductioncited by 19
- 2020Representable Markov Categories and Comparison of Statistical Experiments in Categorical Probabilitycited by 11
- 2020Co-Design of Embodied Intelligence: A Structured Approachcited by 7
- 2022Constructing MDP Abstractions Using Data with Formal Guaranteescited by 7
- 2020Co-Design of Autonomous Systems: From Hardware Selection to Control Synthesiscited by 6
- 2022Categorical semantics of compositional reinforcement learningcited by 5
- 2020Categorical Semantics of Cyber-Physical Systems Theorycited by 4
- 2024Reinforcement Learning in Categorical Cyberneticscited by 4
- 2020Co-Design to Enable User-Friendly Tools to Assess the Impact of Future Mobility Solutionscited by 3
- 2023Compositional Probabilistic Model Checking with String Diagrams of MDPscited by 3
- 2021Compositional Thinking in Cyberphysical Systems Theorycited by 2
- 2024A Compositional Framework for First-Order Optimizationcited by 2
- 2021Compositional Cyber-Physical Systems Modelingcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.