Is Generative AI the Next Tactical Cyber Weapon For Threat Actors? Unforeseen Implications of AI Generated Cyber Attacks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In an era where digital threats are increasingly sophisticated, the intersection of Artificial Intelligence and cybersecurity presents both promising defenses and potent dangers. This paper delves into the escalating threat posed by the misuse of AI, specifically through the use of Large Language Models (LLMs). This study details various techniques like the switch method and character play method, which can be exploited by cybercriminals to generate and automate cyber attacks. Through a series of controlled experiments, the paper demonstrates how these models can be manipulated to bypass ethical and privacy safeguards to effectively generate cyber attacks such as social engineering, malicious code, payload generation, and spyware. By testing these AI generated attacks on live systems, the study assesses their effectiveness and the vulnerabilities they exploit, offering a practical perspective on the risks AI poses to critical infrastructure. We also introduce Occupy AI, a customized, finetuned LLM specifically engineered to automate and execute cyberattacks. This specialized AI driven tool is adept at crafting steps and generating executable code for a variety of cyber threats, including phishing, malware injection, and system exploitation. The results underscore the urgency for ethical AI practices, robust cybersecurity measures, and regulatory oversight to mitigate AI related threats. This paper aims to elevate awareness within the cybersecurity community about the evolving digital threat landscape, advocating for proactive defense strategies and responsible AI development to protect against emerging cyber threats.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Aug 2024.
Builds on
21 of 44 references.
References · 21
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
- 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,919
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
- 2023"Do Anything Now": Characterizing and Evaluating In-The-Wild Jailbreak Prompts on Large Language Modelscited by 457
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks on Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 306
- 2017A Survey of Machine Learning for Big Code and Naturalnesscited by 220
- 2022What Does it Mean for a Language Model to Preserve Privacy?cited by 194
- 2021Understanding the Capabilities, Limitations, and Societal Impact of Large Language Modelscited by 159
9 more
- 2021Bias Out-of-the-Box: An Empirical Analysis of Intersectional Occupational Biases in Popular Generative Language Modelscited by 141
- 2023From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacycited by 137
- 2021Detoxifying Language Models Risks Marginalizing Minority Voicescited by 106
- 2023Regulating ChatGPT and other Large Generative AI Modelscited by 102
- 2019Membership Inference Attacks on Sequence-to-Sequence Models: Is My Data In Your Machine Translation System?cited by 68
- 2022Theories of "Gender" in NLP Bias Researchcited by 62
- 2021Mitigating harm in language models with conditional-likelihood filtrationcited by 38
- 2022Targeted Phishing Campaigns using Large Scale Language Modelscited by 22
- 2022Adaptive Sampling Strategies to Construct Equitable Training Datasetscited by 18
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.