Disentangled Structural and Featural Representation for Task-Agnostic Graph Valuation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With the emergence of data marketplaces, the demand for methods to assess the value of data has increased significantly. While numerous techniques have been proposed for this purpose, none have specifically addressed graphs as the main data modality. Graphs are widely used across various fields, ranging from chemical molecules to social networks. In this study, we break down graphs into two main components: structural and featural, and we focus on evaluating data without relying on specific task-related metrics, making it applicable in practical scenarios where validation requirements may be lacking. We introduce a novel framework called blind message passing, which aligns the seller's and buyer's graphs using a shared node permutation based on graph matching. This allows us to utilize the graph Wasserstein distance to quantify the differences in the structural distribution of graph datasets, called the structural disparities. We then consider featural aspects of buyers' and sellers' graphs for data valuation and capture their statistical similarities and differences, referred to as relevance and diversity, respectively. Our approach ensures that buyers and sellers remain unaware of each other's datasets. Our experiments on real datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach in capturing the relevance, diversity, and structural disparities of seller data for buyers, particularly in graph-based data valuation scenarios.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Aug 2024.
Builds on
22 of 41 references.
References · 22
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
- 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
- 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,277
- 2016Revisiting Semi-Supervised Learning with Graph Embeddingscited by 970
- 2020A Generalization of Transformer Networks to Graphscited by 653
- 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 617
- 2021Graph Neural Networks with Learnable Structural and Positional Representationscited by 326
- 2019Towards Efficient Data Valuation Based on the Shapley Valuecited by 279
10 more
- 2020A Principled Approach to Data Valuation for Federated Learningcited by 127
- 2019Wasserstein Weisfeiler-Lehman Graph Kernelscited by 104
- 2020A Survey on Data Pricing: from Economics to Data Sciencecited by 39
- 2018Model-based Pricing for Machine Learning in a Data Marketplacecited by 37
- 2021Data Pricing in Machine Learning Pipelinescited by 17
- 2016Data Collection and Wireless Communication in Internet of Things (IoT) Using Economic Analysis and Pricing Models: A Surveycited by 12
- 2023What functions can Graph Neural Networks compute on random graphs? The role of Positional Encodingcited by 11
- 2019Data Markets to support AI for All: Pricing, Valuation and Governancecited by 6
- 2024Precedence-Constrained Winter Value for Effective Graph Data Valuationcited by 6
- 2023Blind Graph Matching Using Graph Signalscited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.