mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

EvalYaks: Instruction Tuning Datasets and LoRA Fine-tuned Models for Automated Scoring of CEFR B2 Speaking Assessment Transcripts

arXiv 2408.12226 ↗First posted 22 Aug 2024cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Relying on human experts to evaluate CEFR speaking assessments in an e-learning environment creates scalability challenges, as it limits how quickly and widely assessments can be conducted. We aim to automate the evaluation of CEFR B2 English speaking assessments in e-learning environments from conversation transcripts. First, we evaluate the capability of leading open source and commercial Large Language Models (LLMs) to score a candidate's performance across various criteria in the CEFR B2 speaking exam in both global and India-specific contexts. Next, we create a new expert-validated, CEFR-aligned synthetic conversational dataset with transcripts that are rated at different assessment scores. In addition, new instruction-tuned datasets are developed from the English Vocabulary Profile (up to CEFR B2 level) and the CEFR-SP WikiAuto datasets. Finally, using these new datasets, we perform parameter efficient instruction tuning of Mistral Instruct 7B v0.2 to develop a family of models called EvalYaks. Four models in this family are for assessing the four sections of the CEFR B2 speaking exam, one for identifying the CEFR level of vocabulary and generating level-specific vocabulary, and another for detecting the CEFR level of text and generating level-specific text. EvalYaks achieved an average acceptable accuracy of 96%, a degree of variation of 0.35 levels, and performed 3 times better than the next best model. This demonstrates that a 7B parameter LLM instruction tuned with high-quality CEFR-aligned assessment data can effectively evaluate and score CEFR B2 English speaking assessments, offering a promising solution for scalable, automated language proficiency evaluation.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Aug 2024.

Builds on

39 of 72 references.

References · 39

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  2. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  3. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,971
  4. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  5. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  6. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,459
  7. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  8. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 8,065
  9. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,276
  10. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
  11. 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,418
  12. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
27 more
  1. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
  2. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model based Autonomous Agentscited by 2,242
  3. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,075
  4. 2024Mixtral of Expertscited by 1,823
  5. 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,470
  6. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,100
  7. 2022Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Taskscited by 868
  8. 2023MetaMath: Bootstrap Your Own Mathematical Questions for Large Language Modelscited by 735
  9. 2021Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructionscited by 699
  10. 2024Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning for Large Models: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 656
  11. 2023Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 639
  12. 2023JudgeLM: Fine-tuned Large Language Models are Scalable Judgescited by 367
  13. 2023PandaLM: An Automatic Evaluation Benchmark for LLM Instruction Tuning Optimizationcited by 316
  14. 2024Bias and Unfairness in Information Retrieval Systems: New Challenges in the LLM Eracited by 98
  15. 2023EduChat: A Large-Scale Language Model-based Chatbot System for Intelligent Educationcited by 80
  16. 2024Exploring LLM Prompting Strategies for Joint Essay Scoring and Feedback Generationcited by 63
  17. 2023ChatKBQA: A Generate-then-Retrieve Framework for Knowledge Base Question Answering with Fine-tuned Large Language Modelscited by 44
  18. 2024Automated Educational Question Generation at Different Bloom's Skill Levels using Large Language Models: Strategies and Evaluationcited by 29
  19. 2022CEFR-Based Sentence Difficulty Annotation and Assessmentcited by 28
  20. 2024Benchmarking Large Language Models on Controllable Generation under Diversified Instructionscited by 27
  21. 2023Mixture of Soft Prompts for Controllable Data Generationcited by 23
  22. 2023Towards LLM-based Autograding for Short Textual Answerscited by 20
  23. 2023Balancing Specialized and General Skills in LLMs: The Impact of Modern Tuning and Data Strategycited by 18
  24. 2023Performance of the Pre-Trained Large Language Model GPT-4 on Automated Short Answer Gradingcited by 15
  25. 2024Exploring Automated Distractor Generation for Math Multiple-choice Questions via Large Language Modelscited by 15
  26. 2024Math Multiple Choice Question Generation via Human-Large Language Model Collaborationcited by 9
  27. 2021Are pre-trained text representations useful for multilingual and multi-dimensional language proficiency modeling?cited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.