mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SimBench: A Framework for Evaluating and Diagnosing LLM-Based Digital-Twin Generation for Multi-Physics Simulation

arXiv 2408.11987 ↗First posted 21 Aug 2024cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce SimBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate the proficiency of simulator-oriented LLMs (S-LLMs) in generating digital twins (DTs) that can be used in simulators for virtual testing. Given a collection of S-LLMs, this benchmark ranks them according to their ability to produce high-quality DTs. We demonstrate this by comparing over 33 open- and closed-source S-LLMs. Using multi-turn interactions, SimBench employs an LLM-as-a-judge (J-LLM) that leverages both predefined rules and human-in-the-loop guidance to assign scores for the DTs generated by the S-LLM, thus providing a consistent and expert-inspired evaluation protocol. The J-LLM is specific to a simulator, and herein the proposed benchmarking approach is demonstrated in conjunction with the open-sourceChrono multi-physics simulator. Chrono provided the backdrop used to assess an S-LLM in relation to the latter's ability to create digital twins for multibody dynamics, finite element analysis, vehicle dynamics, robotic dynamics, and sensor simulations. The proposed benchmarking principle is broadly applicable and enables the assessment of an S-LLM's ability to generate digital twins for other simulation packages, e.g., ANSYS, ABAQUS, OpenFOAM, StarCCM+, IsaacSim, and pyBullet.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Aug 2024.

Builds on

20 of 63 references.

References · 20

  1. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  2. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  3. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  4. 2022Competition-Level Code Generation with AlphaCodecited by 1,427
  5. 2023Is Your Code Generated by ChatGPT Really Correct? Rigorous Evaluation of Large Language Models for Code Generationcited by 1,332
  6. 2023Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluatorscited by 1,050
  7. 2021Measuring Coding Challenge Competence With APPScited by 879
  8. 2024Self-Rewarding Language Modelscited by 654
  9. 2024BigCodeBench: Benchmarking Code Generation with Diverse Function Calls and Complex Instructionscited by 527
  10. 2020CodeBLEU: a Method for Automatic Evaluation of Code Synthesiscited by 468
  11. 2022DS-1000: A Natural and Reliable Benchmark for Data Science Code Generationcited by 442
  12. 2022CodeT: Code Generation with Generated Testscited by 369
8 more
  1. 2023MINT: Evaluating LLMs in Multi-turn Interaction with Tools and Language Feedbackcited by 293
  2. 2022Execution-Based Evaluation for Open-Domain Code Generationcited by 89
  3. 2022Execution-based Evaluation for Data Science Code Generation Modelscited by 31
  4. 2024PyBench: Evaluating LLM Agent on various real-world coding taskscited by 24
  5. 2024LLM experiments with simulation: Large Language Model Multi-Agent System for Simulation Model Parametrization in Digital Twinscited by 16
  6. 2021Can Machines Read Coding Manuals Yet? -- A Benchmark for Building Better Language Models for Code Understandingcited by 5
  7. 2022A Survey of Deep Learning Models for Structural Code Understandingcited by 4
  8. 2024Large Language Models for Explainable Decisions in Dynamic Digital Twinscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.