DOMBA: Double Model Balancing for Access-Controlled Language Models via Minimum-Bounded Aggregation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The utility of large language models (LLMs) depends heavily on the quality and quantity of their training data. Many organizations possess large data corpora that could be leveraged to train or fine-tune LLMs tailored to their specific needs. However, these datasets often come with access restrictions that are based on user privileges and enforced by access control mechanisms. Training LLMs on such datasets could result in exposure of sensitive information to unauthorized users. A straightforward approach for preventing such exposure is to train a separate model for each access level. This, however, may result in low utility models due to the limited amount of training data per model compared to the amount in the entire organizational corpus. Another approach is to train a single LLM on all the data while limiting the exposure of unauthorized information. However, current exposure-limiting methods for LLMs are ineffective for access-controlled data, where sensitive information appears frequently across many training examples. We propose DOMBA - double model balancing - a simple approach for training and deploying LLMs that provides high utility and access-control functionality with security guarantees. DOMBA aggregates the probability distributions of two models, each trained on documents with (potentially many) different access levels, using a "min-bounded" average function (a function that is bounded by the smaller value, e.g., harmonic mean). A detailed mathematical analysis and extensive evaluation show that DOMBA safeguards restricted information while offering utility comparable to non-secure models.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2024.
Builds on
12 of 23 references.
References · 12
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,144
- 2015Aligning Books and Movies: Towards Story-like Visual Explanations by Watching Movies and Reading Bookscited by 1,041
- 2017Differentially Private Federated Learning: A Client Level Perspectivecited by 451
- 2023Scalable Extraction of Training Data from (Production) Language Modelscited by 415
- 2021Differentially Private Fine-tuning of Language Modelscited by 392
- 2016Semi-supervised Knowledge Transfer for Deep Learning from Private Training Datacited by 347
- 2022What Does it Mean for a Language Model to Preserve Privacy?cited by 194
- 2023Can Language Models be Instructed to Protect Personal Information?cited by 46
- 2022Submix: Practical Private Prediction for Large-Scale Language Modelscited by 31
- 2023Rethinking Privacy in Machine Learning Pipelines from an Information Flow Control Perspectivecited by 16
- 2023Information Flow Control in Machine Learning through Modular Model Architecturecited by 11
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.