Tabular Transfer Learning via Prompting LLMs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning with a limited number of labeled data is a central problem in real-world applications of machine learning, as it is often expensive to obtain annotations. To deal with the scarcity of labeled data, transfer learning is a conventional approach; it suggests to learn a transferable knowledge by training a neural network from multiple other sources. In this paper, we investigate transfer learning of tabular tasks, which has been less studied and successful in the literature, compared to other domains, e.g., vision and language. This is because tables are inherently heterogeneous, i.e., they contain different columns and feature spaces, making transfer learning difficult. On the other hand, recent advances in natural language processing suggest that the label scarcity issue can be mitigated by utilizing in-context learning capability of large language models (LLMs). Inspired by this and the fact that LLMs can also process tables within a unified language space, we ask whether LLMs can be effective for tabular transfer learning, in particular, under the scenarios where the source and target datasets are of different format. As a positive answer, we propose a novel tabular transfer learning framework, coined Prompt to Transfer (P2T), that utilizes unlabeled (or heterogeneous) source data with LLMs. Specifically, P2T identifies a column feature in a source dataset that is strongly correlated with a target task feature to create examples relevant to the target task, thus creating pseudo-demonstrations for prompts. Experimental results demonstrate that P2T outperforms previous methods on various tabular learning benchmarks, showing good promise for the important, yet underexplored tabular transfer learning problem. Code is available at https://github.com/jaehyun513/P2T.
Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Aug 2024.
Builds on
25 of 36 references.
References · 25
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 11,979
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
- 2021Multitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalizationcited by 1,462
- 2017DeepFM: A Factorization-Machine based Neural Network for CTR Predictioncited by 673
- 2020Meta Pseudo Labelscited by 372
- 2018GAIN: Missing Data Imputation using Generative Adversarial Netscited by 349
- 2021True Few-Shot Learning with Language Modelscited by 343
- 2022TabLLM: Few-shot Classification of Tabular Data with Large Language Modelscited by 273
- 2019Interpolation Consistency Training for Semi-Supervised Learningcited by 248
13 more
- 2021Noisy Channel Language Model Prompting for Few-Shot Text Classificationcited by 163
- 2022LIFT: Language-Interfaced Fine-Tuning for Non-Language Machine Learning Taskscited by 146
- 2022TransTab: Learning Transferable Tabular Transformers Across Tablescited by 132
- 2021Semi-Supervised Learning of Visual Features by Non-Parametrically Predicting View Assignments with Support Samplescited by 114
- 2021SubTab: Subsetting Features of Tabular Data for Self-Supervised Representation Learningcited by 101
- 2023XTab: Cross-table Pretraining for Tabular Transformerscited by 81
- 2024Making Pre-trained Language Models Great on Tabular Predictioncited by 56
- 2020Trust Issues: Uncertainty Estimation Does Not Enable Reliable OOD Detection On Medical Tabular Datacited by 52
- 2023STUNT: Few-shot Tabular Learning with Self-generated Tasks from Unlabeled Tablescited by 48
- 2020Sequential Deep Learning for Credit Risk Monitoring with Tabular Financial Datacited by 37
- 2023Language models are weak learnerscited by 21
- 2019Why Not to Use Zero Imputation? Correcting Sparsity Bias in Training Neural Networkscited by 16
- 2021Industry Scale Semi-Supervised Learning for Natural Language Understandingcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 5.
10 papers.
- 2025LLM Meeting Decision Trees on Tabular Datacited by 7
- 2026FORESTLLM: Large Language Models Make Random Forest Great on Few-shot Tabular Learningcited by 4
- 2026TabSieve: Explicit In-Table Evidence Selection for Tabular Predictioncited by 4
- 2025LLM Empowered Prototype Learning for Zero and Few-Shot Tasks on Tabular Datacited by 2
- 2025LATTLE: LLM Attention Transplant for Transfer Learning of Tabular Data Across Disparate Domainscited by 2
- 2025LEKA:LLM-Enhanced Knowledge Augmentationcited by 1
- 2026Human-LLM Collaborative Feature Engineering for Tabular Datacited by 1
- 2026BoostLLM: Boosting-inspired LLM Fine-tuning for Few-shot Tabular Classificationcited by 1
- 2025AILS-NTUA at SemEval-2025 Task 8: Language-to-Code prompting and Error Fixing for Tabular Question Answeringcited by 0
- 2026SMETA-ZSL:Semantic Meta-Alignment for Zero-Shot Threat Classificationcited by 0
- 2026SMETA-ZSL:Semantic Meta-Alignment for Zero-Shot Threat Classification10 Jul 2026
- 2026BoostLLM: Boosting-inspired LLM Fine-tuning for Few-shot Tabular Classification7 May 2026
- 2026TabSieve: Explicit In-Table Evidence Selection for Tabular Prediction12 Feb 2026
- 2026Human-LLM Collaborative Feature Engineering for Tabular Data28 Jan 2026
- 2026FORESTLLM: Large Language Models Make Random Forest Great on Few-shot Tabular Learning16 Jan 2026
- 2025LATTLE: LLM Attention Transplant for Transfer Learning of Tabular Data Across Disparate Domains8 Nov 2025
- 2025LLM Empowered Prototype Learning for Zero and Few-Shot Tasks on Tabular Data12 Aug 2025
- 2025LLM Meeting Decision Trees on Tabular Data23 May 2025
- 2025AILS-NTUA at SemEval-2025 Task 8: Language-to-Code prompting and Error Fixing for Tabular Question Answering1 Mar 2025
- 2025LEKA:LLM-Enhanced Knowledge Augmentation29 Jan 2025