On Learning Action Costs from Input Plans
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Most of the work on learning action models focus on learning the actions' dynamics from input plans. This allows us to specify the valid plans of a planning task. However, very little work focuses on learning action costs, which in turn allows us to rank the different plans. In this paper we introduce a new problem: that of learning the costs of a set of actions such that a set of input plans are optimal under the resulting planning model. To solve this problem we present LACFIPk, an algorithm to learn action's costs from unlabeled input plans. We provide theoretical and empirical results showing how LACFIPk can successfully solve this task.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2024.
Builds on
0 of 25 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2025Planning with Minimal Disruptioncited by 0
- 2026Counterfactual Reasoning in Automated Planningcited by 0
- 2026Cycle-Consistent Neural Explanation of Formal Verification Certificatescited by 0
- 2026Cycle-Consistent Neural Explanation of Formal Verification Certificates23 Jun 2026
- 2026Counterfactual Reasoning in Automated Planning4 May 2026
- 2025Planning with Minimal Disruption21 Aug 2025