Tracing Privacy Leakage of Language Models to Training Data via Adjusted Influence Functions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The responses generated by Large Language Models (LLMs) can include sensitive information from individuals and organizations, leading to potential privacy leakage. This work implements Influence Functions (IFs) to trace privacy leakage back to the training data, thereby mitigating privacy concerns of Language Models (LMs). However, we notice that current IFs struggle to accurately estimate the influence of tokens with large gradient norms, potentially overestimating their influence. When tracing the most influential samples, this leads to frequently tracing back to samples with large gradient norm tokens, overshadowing the actual most influential samples even if their influences are well estimated. To address this issue, we propose Heuristically Adjusted IF (HAIF), which reduces the weight of tokens with large gradient norms, thereby significantly improving the accuracy of tracing the most influential samples. To establish easily obtained groundtruth for tracing privacy leakage, we construct two datasets, PII-E and PII-CR, representing two distinct scenarios: one with identical text in the model outputs and pre-training data, and the other where models leverage their reasoning abilities to generate text divergent from pre-training data. HAIF significantly improves tracing accuracy, enhancing it by 20.96% to 73.71% on the PII-E dataset and 3.21% to 45.93% on the PII-CR dataset, compared to the best SOTA IFs against various GPT-2 and QWen-1.5 models. HAIF also outperforms SOTA IFs on real-world pretraining data CLUECorpus2020, demonstrating strong robustness regardless prompt and response lengths.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Aug 2024.
Builds on
19 of 29 references.
References · 19
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
- 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,565
- 2019ZeRO: Memory Optimizations Toward Training Trillion Parameter Modelscited by 1,278
- 2015Optimizing Neural Networks with Kronecker-factored Approximate Curvaturecited by 776
- 2023C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Modelscited by 694
- 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 565
- 2023DecodingTrust: A Comprehensive Assessment of Trustworthiness in GPT Modelscited by 505
- 2023Scalable Extraction of Training Data from (Production) Language Modelscited by 415
- 2023Harnessing the Power of LLMs in Practice: A Survey on ChatGPT and Beyondcited by 409
- 2023A Comprehensive Survey on Pretrained Foundation Models: A History from BERT to ChatGPTcited by 364
- 2023Multi-step Jailbreaking Privacy Attacks on ChatGPTcited by 320
- 2023Studying Large Language Model Generalization with Influence Functionscited by 311
7 more
- 2023Physics of Language Models: Part 3.1, Knowledge Storage and Extractioncited by 264
- 2018Fast Approximate Natural Gradient Descent in a Kronecker-factored Eigenbasiscited by 143
- 2022If Influence Functions are the Answer, Then What is the Question?cited by 142
- 2023Fast Model Debias with Machine Unlearningcited by 70
- 2023Simfluence: Modeling the Influence of Individual Training Examples by Simulating Training Runscited by 52
- 2021Revisiting Methods for Finding Influential Examplescited by 39
- 2020CLUECorpus2020: A Large-scale Chinese Corpus for Pre-training Language Modelcited by 36
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.
- 2024UTrace: Poisoning Forensics for Private Collaborative Learningcited by 3
- 2025Attributing Data for Sharpness-Aware Minimizationcited by 2
- 2025Attributing Data for Sharpness-Aware Minimization5 Jul 2025
- 2024UTrace: Poisoning Forensics for Private Collaborative Learning23 Sep 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Generated Data with Fake Privacy: Hidden Dangers of Fine-tuning Large Language Models on Generated Data
- 2025SoK: The Privacy Paradox of Large Language Models: Advancements, Privacy Risks, and Mitigation
- 2025Controlling What You Share: Assessing Language Model Adherence to Privacy Preferences
- 2026Stop Tracking Me! Proactive Defense Against Attribute Inference Attack in LLMs
- 2023Beyond Memorization: Violating Privacy Via Inference with Large Language Models
- 2026Distilling Human-Aligned Privacy Sensitivity Assessment from Large Language Models
- 2026LADFA: A Framework of Using Large Language Models and Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Personal Data Flow Analysis in Privacy Policies
- 2026On the Privacy of LLMs: An Ablation Study