mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

New Curriculum, New Chance -- Retrieval Augmented Generation for Lesson Planning in Ugandan Secondary Schools. Prototype Quality Evaluation

arXiv 2408.07542 ↗First posted 14 Aug 2024cs.CY cs.AI cs.IRcited by 1

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval

Abstract (arXiv)

Introduction: Poor educational quality in Secondary Schools is still regarded as one of the major struggles in 21st century Uganda - especially in rural areas. Research identifies several problems, including low quality or absent teacher lesson planning. As the government pushes towards the implementation of a new curriculum, exiting lesson plans become obsolete and the problem is worsened. Using a Retrieval Augmented Generation approach, we developed a prototype that generates customized lesson plans based on the government-accredited textbooks. This helps teachers create lesson plans more efficiently and with better quality, ensuring they are fully aligned the new curriculum and the competence-based learning approach. Methods: The prototype was created using Cohere LLM and Sentence Embeddings, and LangChain Framework - and thereafter made available on a public website. Vector stores were trained for three new curriculum textbooks (ICT, Mathematics, History), all at Secondary 1 Level. Twenty-four lessons plans were generated following a pseudo-random generation protocol, based on the suggested periods in the textbooks. The lesson plans were analyzed regarding their technical quality by three independent raters following the Lesson Plan Analysis Protocol (LPAP) by Ndihokubwayo et al. (2022) that is specifically designed for East Africa and competence-based curriculums. Results: Evaluation of 24 lesson plans using the LPAP resulted in an average quality of between 75 and 80%, corresponding to "very good lesson plan". None of the lesson plans scored below 65%, although one lesson plan could be argued to have been missing the topic. In conclusion, the quality of the generated lesson plans is at least comparable, if not better, than those created by humans, as demonstrated in a study in Rwanda, whereby no lesson plan even reached the benchmark of 50%.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 1 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Aug 2024.

Builds on

1 of 20 references.

References · 1

  1. 2024Tailoring Education with GenAI: A New Horizon in Lesson Planningcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Small Models, Big Support: A Local LLM Framework for Educator-Centric Content Creation and Assessment with RAG and CAG
  2. 2025Automated Generation of Curriculum-Aligned Multiple-Choice Questions for Malaysian Secondary Mathematics Using Generative AI
  3. 2025From Course to Skill: Evaluating LLM Performance in Curricular Analytics
  4. 2026An LLM -Powered Assessment Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) For Higher Education
  5. 2023Retrieval-augmented Generation to Improve Math Question-Answering: Trade-offs Between Groundedness and Human Preference
  6. 2025Automatic Large Language Models Creation of Interactive Learning Lessons
  7. 2025OmniBench-RAG: A Multi-Domain Evaluation Platform for Retrieval-Augmented Generation Tools
  8. 2025Aligning LLMs for the Classroom with Knowledge-Based Retrieval -- A Comparative RAG Study