mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Faster Private Minimum Spanning Trees

arXiv 2408.06997 ↗First posted 13 Aug 2024cs.DS cs.CR cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Motivated by applications in clustering and synthetic data generation, we consider the problem of releasing a minimum spanning tree (MST) under edge-weight differential privacy constraints where a graph topology G=(V,E) with n vertices and m edges is public, the weight matrix vecW∈ ℝn × n is private, and we wish to release an approximate MST under ρ-zero-concentrated differential privacy. Weight matrices are considered neighboring if they differ by at most Delta_∞ in each entry, i.e., we consider an ℓ_∞ neighboring relationship. Existing private MST algorithms either add noise to each entry in vecW and estimate the MST by post-processing or add noise to weights in-place during the execution of a specific MST algorithm. Using the post-processing approach with an efficient MST algorithm takes O(n2) time on dense graphs but results in an additive error on the weight of the MST of magnitude O(n2log n). In-place algorithms give asymptotically better utility, but the running time of existing in-place algorithms is O(n3) for dense graphs. Our main result is a new differentially private MST algorithm that matches the utility of existing in-place methods while running in time O(m + n3/2log n) for fixed privacy parameter ρ. The technical core of our algorithm is an efficient sublinear time simulation of Report-Noisy-Max that works by discretizing all edge weights to a multiple of Delta_∞ and forming groups of edges with identical weights. Specifically, we present a data structure that allows us to sample a noisy minimum weight edge among at most O(n2) cut edges in O(√n log n) time. Experimental evaluations support our claims that our algorithm significantly improves previous algorithms either in utility or running time.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 22 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Aug 2024.

Builds on

9 of 22 references.

References · 9

  1. 2016Concentrated Differential Privacy: Simplifications, Extensions, and Lower Boundscited by 339
  2. 2021Winning the NIST Contest: A scalable and general approach to differentially private synthetic datacited by 101
  3. 2020Permute-and-Flip: A new mechanism for differentially private selectioncited by 22
  4. 2021The Permute-and-Flip Mechanism is Identical to Report-Noisy-Max with Exponential Noisecited by 14
  5. 2015Shortest Paths and Distances with Differential Privacycited by 6
  6. 2018Minimum spanning tree release under differential privacy constraintscited by 4
  7. 2018Graph-based Clustering under Differential Privacycited by 4
  8. 2023Massively Parallel Algorithms for High-Dimensional Euclidean Minimum Spanning Treecited by 2
  9. 2024Near-Universally-Optimal Differentially Private Minimum Spanning Treescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.