Minimum spanning tree release under differential privacy constraints
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We investigate the problem of nodes clustering under privacy constraints when representing a dataset as a graph. Our contribution is threefold. First we formally define the concept of differential privacy for structured databases such as graphs, and give an alternative definition based on a new neighborhood notion between graphs. This definition is adapted to particular frameworks that can be met in various application fields such as genomics, world wide web, population survey, etc. Second, we introduce a new algorithm to tackle the issue of privately releasing an approximated minimum spanning tree topology for a simple-undirected-weighted graph. It provides a simple way of producing the topology of a private almost minimum spanning tree which outperforms, in most cases, the state of the art "Laplace mechanism" in terms of weight-approximation error. Finally, we propose a theoretically motivated method combining a sanitizing mechanism (such as Laplace or our new algorithm) with a Minimum Spanning Tree (MST)-based clustering algorithm. It provides an accurate method for nodes clustering in a graph while keeping the sensitive information contained in the edges weights of the private graph. We provide some theoretical results on the robustness of an almost minimum spanning tree construction for Laplace sanitizing mechanisms. These results exhibit which conditions the graph weights should respect in order to consider that the nodes form well separated clusters both for Laplace and our algorithm as sanitizing mechanism. The method has been experimentally evaluated on simulated data, and preliminary results show the good behavior of the algorithm while identifying well separated clusters.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Jan 2018.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023Differentially-Private Hierarchical Clustering with Provable Approximation Guaranteescited by 5
- 2024Faster Private Minimum Spanning Treescited by 1
- 2024Optimal Bounds for Private Minimum Spanning Trees via Input Perturbationcited by 0
- 2025On the Price of Differential Privacy for Hierarchical Clusteringcited by 0
- 2025On the Price of Differential Privacy for Hierarchical Clustering22 Apr 2025
- 2024Optimal Bounds for Private Minimum Spanning Trees via Input Perturbation13 Dec 2024
- 2024Faster Private Minimum Spanning Trees13 Aug 2024
- 2023Differentially-Private Hierarchical Clustering with Provable Approximation Guarantees31 Jan 2023