mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Dynamic and Compressive Adaptation of Transformers From Images to Videos

arXiv 2408.06840 ↗First posted 13 Aug 2024cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recently, the remarkable success of pre-trained Vision Transformers (ViTs) from image-text matching has sparked an interest in image-to-video adaptation. However, most current approaches retain the full forward pass for each frame, leading to a high computation overhead for processing entire videos. In this paper, we present InTI, a novel approach for compressive image-to-video adaptation using dynamic Inter-frame Token Interpolation. InTI aims to softly preserve the informative tokens without disrupting their coherent spatiotemporal structure. Specifically, each token pair at identical positions within neighbor frames is linearly aggregated into a new token, where the aggregation weights are generated by a multi-scale context-aware network. In this way, the information of neighbor frames can be adaptively compressed in a point-by-point manner, thereby effectively reducing the number of processed frames by half each time. Importantly, InTI can be seamlessly integrated with existing adaptation methods, achieving strong performance without extra-complex design. On Kinetics-400, InTI reaches a top-1 accuracy of 87.1 with a remarkable 37.5% reduction in GFLOPs compared to naive adaptation. When combined with additional temporal modules, InTI achieves a top-1 accuracy of 87.6 with a 37% reduction in GFLOPs. Similar conclusions have been verified in other common datasets.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 49 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Aug 2024.

Builds on

49 of 57 references.

References · 49

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  4. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,669
  5. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,502
  6. 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,270
  7. 2017The Kinetics Human Action Video Datasetcited by 1,909
  8. 2021Is Space-Time Attention All You Need for Video Understanding?cited by 1,620
  9. 2022VideoMAE: Masked Autoencoders are Data-Efficient Learners for Self-Supervised Video Pre-Trainingcited by 1,322
  10. 2017A Closer Look at Spatiotemporal Convolutions for Action Recognitioncited by 1,143
  11. 2017The "something something" video database for learning and evaluating visual common sensecited by 1,103
  12. 2022Token Merging: Your ViT But Fastercited by 1,021
37 more
  1. 2016Temporal Segment Networks: Towards Good Practices for Deep Action Recognitioncited by 902
  2. 2021Multiscale Vision Transformerscited by 897
  3. 2021DynamicViT: Efficient Vision Transformers with Dynamic Token Sparsificationcited by 864
  4. 2018TSM: Temporal Shift Module for Efficient Video Understandingcited by 856
  5. 2023VideoMAE V2: Scaling Video Masked Autoencoders with Dual Maskingcited by 528
  6. 2022Expanding Language-Image Pretrained Models for General Video Recognitioncited by 321
  7. 2021ActionCLIP: A New Paradigm for Video Action Recognitioncited by 320
  8. 2021Prompting Visual-Language Models for Efficient Video Understandingcited by 310
  9. 2021Video Transformer Networkcited by 272
  10. 2022ST-Adapter: Parameter-Efficient Image-to-Video Transfer Learningcited by 193
  11. 2020TDN: Temporal Difference Networks for Efficient Action Recognitioncited by 183
  12. 2022Frozen CLIP Models are Efficient Video Learnerscited by 182
  13. 2022Fine-tuned CLIP Models are Efficient Video Learnerscited by 179
  14. 2020TEA: Temporal Excitation and Aggregation for Action Recognitioncited by 165
  15. 2023AIM: Adapting Image Models for Efficient Video Action Recognitioncited by 148
  16. 2021Not All Images are Worth 16x16 Words: Dynamic Transformers for Efficient Image Recognitioncited by 144
  17. 2019STM: SpatioTemporal and Motion Encoding for Action Recognitioncited by 142
  18. 2020TAM: Temporal Adaptive Module for Video Recognitioncited by 139
  19. 2023Extracting Motion and Appearance via Inter-Frame Attention for Efficient Video Frame Interpolationcited by 98
  20. 2019TEINet: Towards an Efficient Architecture for Video Recognitioncited by 92
  21. 2017Optical Flow Guided Feature: A Fast and Robust Motion Representation for Video Action Recognitioncited by 82
  22. 2023DiffRate : Differentiable Compression Rate for Efficient Vision Transformerscited by 77
  23. 2020MotionSqueeze: Neural Motion Feature Learning for Video Understandingcited by 72
  24. 2022Revisiting Classifier: Transferring Vision-Language Models for Video Recognitioncited by 71
  25. 2021Efficient Video Transformers with Spatial-Temporal Token Selectioncited by 59
  26. 2023Revisiting Temporal Modeling for CLIP-based Image-to-Video Knowledge Transferringcited by 58
  27. 2023Implicit Temporal Modeling with Learnable Alignment for Video Recognitioncited by 46
  28. 2023MGMAE: Motion Guided Masking for Video Masked Autoencodingcited by 41
  29. 2023Disentangling Spatial and Temporal Learning for Efficient Image-to-Video Transfer Learningcited by 32
  30. 2018StNet: Local and Global Spatial-Temporal Modeling for Action Recognitioncited by 28
  31. 2024AWT: Transferring Vision-Language Models via Augmentation, Weighting, and Transportationcited by 28
  32. 2023Prune Spatio-temporal Tokens by Semantic-aware Temporal Accumulationcited by 24
  33. 2024VFIMamba: Video Frame Interpolation with State Space Modelscited by 22
  34. 2024Dual DETRs for Multi-Label Temporal Action Detectioncited by 20
  35. 2023ZeroI2V: Zero-Cost Adaptation of Pre-trained Transformers from Image to Videocited by 14
  36. 2023What Can Simple Arithmetic Operations Do for Temporal Modeling?cited by 12
  37. 2024VideoEval: Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Low-Cost Evaluation of Video Foundation Modelcited by 12

Built on by

Not cited yet.