EditScribe: Non-Visual Image Editing with Natural Language Verification Loops
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Image editing is an iterative process that requires precise visual evaluation and manipulation for the output to match the editing intent. However, current image editing tools do not provide accessible interaction nor sufficient feedback for blind and low vision individuals to achieve this level of control. To address this, we developed EditScribe, a prototype system that makes image editing accessible using natural language verification loops powered by large multimodal models. Using EditScribe, the user first comprehends the image content through initial general and object descriptions, then specifies edit actions using open-ended natural language prompts. EditScribe performs the image edit, and provides four types of verification feedback for the user to verify the performed edit, including a summary of visual changes, AI judgement, and updated general and object descriptions. The user can ask follow-up questions to clarify and probe into the edits or verification feedback, before performing another edit. In a study with ten blind or low-vision users, we found that EditScribe supported participants to perform and verify image edit actions non-visually. We observed different prompting strategies from participants, and their perceptions on the various types of verification feedback. Finally, we discuss the implications of leveraging natural language verification loops to make visual authoring non-visually accessible.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 89 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Aug 2024.
Builds on
24 of 89 references.
References · 24
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
- 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,158
- 2022Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latentscited by 6,539
- 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
- 2022InstructPix2Pix: Learning to Follow Image Editing Instructionscited by 2,591
- 2022Prompt-to-Prompt Image Editing with Cross Attention Controlcited by 2,409
- 2021Resolution-robust Large Mask Inpainting with Fourier Convolutionscited by 730
- 2023Segment Everything Everywhere All at Oncecited by 546
- 2023Zero-shot Image-to-Image Translationcited by 503
- 2024YOLOv9: Learning What You Want to Learn Using Programmable Gradient Informationcited by 422
12 more
- 2023Emu Edit: Precise Image Editing via Recognition and Generation Taskscited by 321
- 2023Set-of-Mark Prompting Unleashes Extraordinary Visual Grounding in GPT-4Vcited by 291
- 2023Inpaint Anything: Segment Anything Meets Image Inpaintingcited by 233
- 2023Semantic-SAM: Segment and Recognize Anything at Any Granularitycited by 185
- 2023Inst-Inpaint: Instructing to Remove Objects with Diffusion Modelscited by 66
- 2022UniTune: Text-Driven Image Editing by Fine Tuning a Diffusion Model on a Single Imagecited by 42
- 2023ConZIC: Controllable Zero-shot Image Captioning by Sampling-Based Polishingcited by 33
- 2023AVscript: Accessible Video Editing with Audio-Visual Scriptscited by 19
- 2023GenAssist: Making Image Generation Accessiblecited by 18
- 2024Making Short-Form Videos Accessible with Hierarchical Video Summariescited by 14
- 2018The Effect of Computer-Generated Descriptions on Photo-Sharing Experiences of People with Visual Impairmentscited by 6
- 2022"It Feels Like Being Locked in A Cage": Understanding Blind or Low Vision Streamers' Perceptions of Content Curation Algorithmscited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2025Surfacing Variations to Calibrate Perceived Reliability of MLLM-generated Image Descriptionscited by 6
- 2024Substance Beats Style: Why Beginning Students Fail to Code with LLMscited by 5
- 2025"It's trained by non-disabled people": Evaluating How Image Quality Affects Product Captioning with Vision-Language Modelscited by 3
- 2025Probing the Gaps in ChatGPT Live Video Chat for Real-World Assistance for People who are Blind or Visually Impairedcited by 2
- 2026CoEditor++: Instruction-based Visual Editing via Cognitive Reasoningcited by 1
- 2026Sidekick: Designing Communication for Effective Multitasking with Computer Use Agentscited by 0
- 2026Sidekick: Designing Communication for Effective Multitasking with Computer Use Agents20 Jul 2026
- 2026CoEditor++: Instruction-based Visual Editing via Cognitive Reasoning31 Jan 2026
- 2025"It's trained by non-disabled people": Evaluating How Image Quality Affects Product Captioning with Vision-Language Models12 Nov 2025
- 2025Probing the Gaps in ChatGPT Live Video Chat for Real-World Assistance for People who are Blind or Visually Impaired5 Aug 2025
- 2025Surfacing Variations to Calibrate Perceived Reliability of MLLM-generated Image Descriptions21 Jul 2025
- 2024Substance Beats Style: Why Beginning Students Fail to Code with LLMs15 Oct 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Learning to Follow Object-Centric Image Editing Instructions Faithfully
- 2026Is This Edit Correct? A Multi-Dimensional Benchmark for Reasoning-Aware Image Editing
- 2026TalkPhoto: A Versatile Training-Free Conversational Assistant for Intelligent Image Editing
- 2023EditVal: Benchmarking Diffusion Based Text-Guided Image Editing Methods
- 2026IEA: Amateur-Friendly Conversational Image Editing Agent via Three Stages of Multitask Alignment
- 2023SmartEdit: Exploring Complex Instruction-based Image Editing with Multimodal Large Language Models
- 2026EditRefiner: A Human-Aligned Agentic Framework for Image Editing Refinement
- 2024Instruction-Guided Editing Controls for Images and Multimedia: A Survey in LLM era