Enhancing Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Cooperation in Decentralized MARL via GNN-driven Intrinsic Rewards
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) is emerging as a key framework for various sequential decision-making and control tasks. Unlike their single-agent counterparts, multi-agent systems necessitate successful cooperation among the agents. The deployment of these systems in real-world scenarios often requires decentralized training, a diverse set of agents, and learning from infrequent environmental reward signals. These challenges become more pronounced under partial observability and the lack of prior knowledge about agent heterogeneity. While notable studies use intrinsic motivation (IM) to address reward sparsity or cooperation in decentralized settings, those dealing with heterogeneity typically assume centralized training, parameter sharing, and agent indexing. To overcome these limitations, we propose the CoHet algorithm, which utilizes a novel Graph Neural Network (GNN) based intrinsic motivation to facilitate the learning of heterogeneous agent policies in decentralized settings, under the challenges of partial observability and reward sparsity. Evaluation of CoHet in the Multi-agent Particle Environment (MPE) and Vectorized Multi-Agent Simulator (VMAS) benchmarks demonstrates superior performance compared to the state-of-the-art in a range of cooperative multi-agent scenarios. Our research is supplemented by an analysis of the impact of the agent dynamics model on the intrinsic motivation module, insights into the performance of different CoHet variants, and its robustness to an increasing number of heterogeneous agents.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2024.
Builds on
17 of 31 references.
References · 17
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
- 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,279
- 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,571
- 2017Counterfactual Multi-Agent Policy Gradientscited by 733
- 2016Learning to Communicate with Deep Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 561
- 2020Is Independent Learning All You Need in the StarCraft Multi-Agent Challenge?cited by 281
- 2018Actor-Attention-Critic for Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 259
- 2020ROMA: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Emergent Rolescited by 135
- 2021Celebrating Diversity in Shared Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 96
- 2023TorchRL: A data-driven decision-making library for PyTorchcited by 59
- 2017Guided Deep Reinforcement Learning for Swarm Systemscited by 44
- 2019Dealing with Sparse Rewards in Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
5 more
- 2022MASER: Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning with Subgoals Generated from Experience Replay Buffercited by 34
- 2020Heterogeneous Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Unknown Environment Mappingcited by 12
- 2022ELIGN: Expectation Alignment as a Multi-Agent Intrinsic Rewardcited by 11
- 2020Cooperative Heterogeneous Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 7
- 2022Collaborative Training of Heterogeneous Reinforcement Learning Agents in Environments with Sparse Rewards: What and When to Share?cited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.