mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Text2Interaction: Establishing Safe and Preferable Human-Robot Interaction

arXiv 2408.06105 ↗First posted 12 Aug 2024cs.ROcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Adjusting robot behavior to human preferences can require intensive human feedback, preventing quick adaptation to new users and changing circumstances. Moreover, current approaches typically treat user preferences as a reward, which requires a manual balance between task success and user satisfaction. To integrate new user preferences in a zero-shot manner, our proposed Text2Interaction framework invokes large language models to generate a task plan, motion preferences as Python code, and parameters of a safety controller. By maximizing the combined probability of task completion and user satisfaction instead of a weighted sum of rewards, we can reliably find plans that fulfill both requirements. We find that 83 % of users working with Text2Interaction agree that it integrates their preferences into the plan of the robot, and 94 % prefer Text2Interaction over the baseline. Our ablation study shows that Text2Interaction aligns better with unseen preferences than other baselines while maintaining a high success rate. Real-world demonstrations and code are made available at sites.google.com/view/text2interaction.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2024.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4.

4 papers.