mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Global-to-Local Support Spectrums for Language Model Explainability

arXiv 2408.05976 ↗First posted 12 Aug 2024cs.LG cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing sample-based methods, like influence functions and representer points, measure the importance of a training point by approximating the effect of its removal from training. As such, they are skewed towards outliers and points that are very close to the decision boundaries. The explanations provided by these methods are often static and not specific enough for different test points. In this paper, we propose a method to generate an explanation in the form of support spectrums which are based on two main ideas: the support sets and a global-to-local importance measure. The support set is the set of training points, in the predicted class, that ``lie in between'' the test point and training points in the other classes. They indicate how well the test point can be distinguished from the points not in the predicted class. The global-to-local importance measure is obtained by decoupling existing methods into the global and local components which are then used to select the points in the support set. Using this method, we are able to generate explanations that are tailored to specific test points. In the experiments, we show the effectiveness of the method in image classification and text generation tasks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 20 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2024.

Builds on

15 of 20 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
  2. 2019Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine Learningcited by 617
  3. 2020Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient Descentcited by 565
  4. 2020What Neural Networks Memorize and Why: Discovering the Long Tail via Influence Estimationcited by 492
  5. 2019Towards Efficient Data Valuation Based on the Shapley Valuecited by 279
  6. 2021Beta Shapley: a Unified and Noise-reduced Data Valuation Framework for Machine Learningcited by 162
  7. 2018Stronger Data Poisoning Attacks Break Data Sanitization Defensescited by 125
  8. 2018Understanding the Origins of Bias in Word Embeddingscited by 90
  9. 2019Repairing without Retraining: Avoiding Disparate Impact with Counterfactual Distributionscited by 48
  10. 2018A representer theorem for deep neural networkscited by 38
  11. 2022First is Better Than Last for Language Data Influencecited by 34
  12. 2019Can You Trust This Prediction? Auditing Pointwise Reliability After Learningcited by 28
3 more
  1. 2020RelatIF: Identifying Explanatory Training Examples via Relative Influencecited by 28
  2. 2017A representer theorem for deep kernel learningcited by 26
  3. 2019A unifying representer theorem for inverse problems and machine learningcited by 24

Built on by

Not cited yet.