Recognizing Limits: Investigating Infeasibility in Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable performance in various tasks but often fail to handle queries that exceed their knowledge and capabilities, leading to incorrect or fabricated responses. This paper addresses the need for LLMs to recognize and refuse infeasible tasks due to the requests surpassing their capabilities. We conceptualize four main categories of infeasible tasks for LLMs, which cover a broad spectrum of hallucination-related challenges identified in prior literature. We develop and benchmark a new dataset comprising diverse infeasible and feasible tasks to evaluate multiple LLMs' abilities to decline infeasible tasks. Furthermore, we explore the potential of increasing LLMs' refusal capabilities with fine-tuning. Our experiments validate the effectiveness of the trained models, suggesting promising directions for improving the performance of LLMs in real-world applications.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 33 of its 64 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Aug 2024.
Builds on
33 of 64 references.
References · 33
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 12,865
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
- 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
- 2023Improved Baselines with Visual Instruction Tuningcited by 4,362
- 2023Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use Toolscited by 4,072
- 2022Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated Instructionscited by 2,674
- 2020Learning to summarize from human feedbackcited by 2,562
- 2023Can LLMs Express Their Uncertainty? An Empirical Evaluation of Confidence Elicitation in LLMscited by 946
21 more
- 2022Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Taskscited by 858
- 2023Just Ask for Calibration: Strategies for Eliciting Calibrated Confidence Scores from Language Models Fine-Tuned with Human Feedbackcited by 788
- 2023The RefinedWeb Dataset for Falcon LLM: Outperforming Curated Corpora with Web Data, and Web Data Onlycited by 755
- 2022Teaching Models to Express Their Uncertainty in Wordscited by 731
- 2023Visual ChatGPT: Talking, Drawing and Editing with Visual Foundation Modelscited by 659
- 2023The Internal State of an LLM Knows When It's Lyingcited by 644
- 2021Revisiting the Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 387
- 2023A Survey of Hallucination in Large Foundation Modelscited by 365
- 2019Verified Uncertainty Calibrationcited by 307
- 2023A Stitch in Time Saves Nine: Detecting and Mitigating Hallucinations of LLMs by Validating Low-Confidence Generationcited by 202
- 2022Factuality Enhanced Language Models for Open-Ended Text Generationcited by 200
- 2024Don't Hallucinate, Abstain: Identifying LLM Knowledge Gaps via Multi-LLM Collaborationcited by 176
- 2023Decomposing Uncertainty for Large Language Models through Input Clarification Ensemblingcited by 113
- 2022Uncertainty Quantification with Pre-trained Language Models: A Large-Scale Empirical Analysiscited by 104
- 2023Consciousness in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Science of Consciousnesscited by 99
- 2023Enhancing Uncertainty-Based Hallucination Detection with Stronger Focuscited by 98
- 2024Plan-Seq-Learn: Language Model Guided RL for Solving Long Horizon Robotics Taskscited by 51
- 2023Learn to Refuse: Making Large Language Models More Controllable and Reliable through Knowledge Scope Limitation and Refusal Mechanismcited by 33
- 2023Examining LLMs' Uncertainty Expression Towards Questions Outside Parametric Knowledgecited by 32
- 2024Characterizing LLM Abstention Behavior in Science QA with Context Perturbationscited by 26
- 2023The feasibility of artificial consciousness through the lens of neurosciencecited by 18
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2024Dual Active Learning for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedbackcited by 19
- 2025PersonaEval: Are LLM Evaluators Human Enough to Judge Role-Play?cited by 9
- 2026From Anatomy to Smells: An Empirical Study of SKILL.md in Agent Skillscited by 5
- 2026Position: Vision-Language-Action Models Cannot Be Verified to Perform Physical Reasoningcited by 0
- 2026From Anatomy to Smells: An Empirical Study of SKILL.md in Agent Skills1 Jul 2026
- 2026Position: Vision-Language-Action Models Cannot Be Verified to Perform Physical Reasoning28 Jun 2026
- 2025PersonaEval: Are LLM Evaluators Human Enough to Judge Role-Play?6 Aug 2025
- 2024Dual Active Learning for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback3 Oct 2024