Evaluating the capability of large language models to personalize science texts for diverse middle-school-age learners
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs), including OpenAI's GPT-series, have made significant advancements in recent years. Known for their expertise across diverse subject areas and quick adaptability to user-provided prompts, LLMs hold unique potential as Personalized Learning (PL) tools. Despite this potential, their application in K-12 education remains largely unexplored. This paper presents one of the first randomized controlled trials (n = 23) to evaluate the effectiveness of GPT-4 in personalizing educational science texts for middle school students. In this study, GPT-4 was used to profile student learning preferences based on choices made during a training session. For the experimental group, GPT-4 was used to rewrite science texts to align with the student's predicted profile while, for students in the control group, texts were rewritten to contradict their learning preferences. The results of a Mann-Whitney U test showed that students significantly preferred (at the .10 level) the rewritten texts when they were aligned with their profile (p = .059). These findings suggest that GPT-4 can effectively interpret and tailor educational content to diverse learner preferences, marking a significant advancement in PL technology. The limitations of this study and ethical considerations for using artificial intelligence in education are also discussed.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 62 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Aug 2024.
Builds on
11 of 62 references.
References · 11
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023ChainForge: A Visual Toolkit for Prompt Engineering and LLM Hypothesis Testingcited by 88
- 2023Comparing Code Explanations Created by Students and Large Language Modelscited by 63
- 2023Unveiling Security, Privacy, and Ethical Concerns of ChatGPTcited by 53
- 2023Fine-tuning ChatGPT for Automatic Scoringcited by 50
- 2023A Comparative Study of AI-Generated (GPT-4) and Human-crafted MCQs in Programming Educationcited by 34
- 2023Mind meets machine: Unravelling GPT-4's cognitive psychologycited by 31
- 2023Evaluating GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 Models on Brazilian University Admission Examscited by 25
- 2024Can Large Language Models Make the Grade? An Empirical Study Evaluating LLMs Ability to Mark Short Answer Questions in K-12 Educationcited by 11
- 2024Beyond Accuracy: Investigating Error Types in GPT-4 Responses to USMLE Questionscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.