mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Quantifying the Impact of Population Shift Across Age and Sex for Abdominal Organ Segmentation

arXiv 2408.04610 ↗First posted 8 Aug 2024eess.IV cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep learning-based medical image segmentation has seen tremendous progress over the last decade, but there is still relatively little transfer into clinical practice. One of the main barriers is the challenge of domain generalisation, which requires segmentation models to maintain high performance across a wide distribution of image data. This challenge is amplified by the many factors that contribute to the diverse appearance of medical images, such as acquisition conditions and patient characteristics. The impact of shifting patient characteristics such as age and sex on segmentation performance remains relatively under-studied, especially for abdominal organs, despite that this is crucial for ensuring the fairness of the segmentation model. We perform the first study to determine the impact of population shift with respect to age and sex on abdominal CT image segmentation, by leveraging two large public datasets, and introduce a novel metric to quantify the impact. We find that population shift is a challenge similar in magnitude to cross-dataset shift for abdominal organ segmentation, and that the effect is asymmetric and dataset-dependent. We conclude that dataset diversity in terms of known patient characteristics is not necessarily equivalent to dataset diversity in terms of image features. This implies that simple population matching to ensure good generalisation and fairness may be insufficient, and we recommend that fairness research should be directed towards better understanding and quantifying medical image dataset diversity in terms of performance-relevant characteristics such as organ morphology.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2024.

Builds on

17 of 29 references.

References · 17

  1. 2016V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2,284
  2. 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
  3. 2021UNETR: Transformers for 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 954
  4. 2021Domain Generalization: A Surveycited by 760
  5. 2021The Medical Segmentation Decathloncited by 620
  6. 2021Domain Adaptation for Medical Image Analysis: A Surveycited by 351
  7. 2022AMOS: A Large-Scale Abdominal Multi-Organ Benchmark for Versatile Medical Image Segmentationcited by 347
  8. 2019Causality matters in medical imagingcited by 193
  9. 2021Reading Race: AI Recognises Patient's Racial Identity In Medical Imagescited by 155
  10. 2023Change is Hard: A Closer Look at Subpopulation Shiftcited by 119
  11. 2019Automated Design of Deep Learning Methods for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 27
  12. 2021Enhancing MR Image Segmentation with Realistic Adversarial Data Augmentationcited by 20
5 more
  1. 2022A Study of Demographic Bias in CNN-based Brain MR Segmentationcited by 16
  2. 2022Bias in Machine Learning Models Can Be Significantly Mitigated by Careful Training: Evidence from Neuroimaging Studiescited by 14
  3. 2022A systematic study of race and sex bias in CNN-based cardiac MR segmentationcited by 9
  4. 2021Cutting-edge 3D Medical Image Segmentation Methods in 2020: Are Happy Families All Alike?cited by 7
  5. 2023Multi-Contrast Computed Tomography Atlas of Healthy Pancreascited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

2 papers.