The Ungrounded Alignment Problem
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern machine learning systems have demonstrated substantial abilities with methods that either embrace or ignore human-provided knowledge, but combining benefits of both styles remains a challenge. One particular challenge involves designing learning systems that exhibit built-in responses to specific abstract stimulus patterns, yet are still plastic enough to be agnostic about the modality and exact form of their inputs. In this paper, we investigate what we call The Ungrounded Alignment Problem, which asks How can we build in predefined knowledge in a system where we don't know how a given stimulus will be grounded? This paper examines a simplified version of the general problem, where an unsupervised learner is presented with a sequence of images for the characters in a text corpus, and this learner is later evaluated on its ability to recognize specific (possibly rare) sequential patterns. Importantly, the learner is given no labels during learning or evaluation, but must map images from an unknown font or permutation to its correct class label. That is, at no point is our learner given labeled images, where an image vector is explicitly associated with a class label. Despite ample work in unsupervised and self-supervised loss functions, all current methods require a labeled fine-tuning phase to map the learned representations to correct classes. Finding this mapping in the absence of labels may seem a fool's errand, but our main result resolves this seeming paradox. We show that leveraging only letter bigram frequencies is sufficient for an unsupervised learner both to reliably associate images to class labels and to reliably identify trigger words in the sequence of inputs. More generally, this method suggests an approach for encoding specific desired innate behaviour in modality-agnostic models.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 Aug 2024.
Builds on
19 of 36 references.
References · 19
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,712
- 2013Auto-Encoding Variational Bayescited by 3,980
- 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
- 2020Sharpness-Aware Minimization for Efficiently Improving Generalizationcited by 1,404
- 2023Self-Supervised Learning from Images with a Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecturecited by 982
- 2013An Empirical Investigation of Catastrophic Forgetting in Gradient-Based Neural Networkscited by 711
- 2017Word Translation Without Parallel Datacited by 480
- 2021The Role of Permutation Invariance in Linear Mode Connectivity of Neural Networkscited by 285
- 2017Unsupervised Machine Translation Using Monolingual Corpora Onlycited by 272
- 2017EMNIST: an extension of MNIST to handwritten letterscited by 212
7 more
- 2014Qualitatively characterizing neural network optimization problemscited by 186
- 2023Getting aligned on representational alignmentcited by 142
- 2022Pushing the limits of self-supervised ResNets: Can we outperform supervised learning without labels on ImageNet?cited by 67
- 2020A survey on Semi-, Self- and Unsupervised Learning for Image Classificationcited by 55
- 2022WaveMix: A Resource-efficient Neural Network for Image Analysiscited by 19
- 2015Towards Principled Unsupervised Learningcited by 4
- 2022Cross-Modal Alignment Learning of Vision-Language Conceptual Systemscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.