LAMPO: Large Language Models as Preference Machines for Few-shot Ordinal Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We introduce LAMPO, a novel paradigm that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) for solving few-shot multi-class ordinal classification tasks. Unlike conventional methods, which concatenate all demonstration examples with the test instance and prompt LLMs to produce the pointwise prediction, our framework uses the LLM as a preference machine that makes a relative comparative decision between the test instance and each demonstration. A self-supervised method is then introduced to aggregate these binary comparisons into the final ordinal decision. LAMPO addresses several limitations inherent in previous methods, including context length constraints, ordering biases, and challenges associated with absolute point-wise estimation. Extensive experiments on seven public datasets demonstrate LAMPO's remarkably competitive performance across a diverse spectrum of applications (e.g., movie review analysis and hate speech detection). Notably, in certain applications, the improvement can be substantial, exceeding 20% in an absolute term. Moreover, we believe LAMPO represents an interesting addition to the non-parametric application layered on top of LLMs, as it supports black-box LLMs without necessitating the outputting of LLM's internal states (e.g., embeddings), as seen in previous approaches.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 Aug 2024.
Builds on
25 of 28 references.
References · 25
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,383
- 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,175
- 2022Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Modelscited by 2,997
- 2021Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Modelscited by 1,371
- 2021What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-3?cited by 1,184
- 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,122
- 2021Train Short, Test Long: Attention with Linear Biases Enables Input Length Extrapolationcited by 1,085
- 2021Learning To Retrieve Prompts for In-Context Learningcited by 641
- 2023Large Language Models Are State-of-the-Art Evaluators of Translation Qualitycited by 416
- 2020TweetEval: Unified Benchmark and Comparative Evaluation for Tweet Classificationcited by 414
13 more
- 2021True Few-Shot Learning with Language Modelscited by 343
- 2023Large Language Models are Effective Text Rankers with Pairwise Ranking Promptingcited by 302
- 2023Sentiment Analysis in the Era of Large Language Models: A Reality Checkcited by 262
- 2022Black-Box Tuning for Language-Model-as-a-Servicecited by 254
- 2023Don't Make Your LLM an Evaluation Benchmark Cheatercited by 194
- 2023Large language models can accurately predict searcher preferencescited by 129
- 2024LiPO: Listwise Preference Optimization through Learning-to-Rankcited by 94
- 2023Mitigating Label Biases for In-context Learningcited by 88
- 2022Parallel Context Windows for Large Language Modelscited by 81
- 2024Foundational Autoraters: Taming Large Language Models for Better Automatic Evaluationcited by 72
- 2022A Survey on Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis: Tasks, Methods, and Challengescited by 61
- 2023kNN Prompting: Beyond-Context Learning with Calibration-Free Nearest Neighbor Inferencecited by 47
- 2023Predicting Text Preference Via Structured Comparative Reasoningcited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2025Improving LLM-as-a-Judge Inference with the Judgment Distributioncited by 36
- 2025WebDevJudge: Evaluating (M)LLMs as Critiques for Web Development Qualitycited by 10
- 2025Always Tell Me The Odds: Fine-grained Conditional Probability Estimationcited by 9
- 2026Are LLMs Positionally Consistent Ordinal Classifiers? A Systematic Evaluationcited by 1
- 2026A Calibrated Reflection Approach for Enhancing Confidence Estimation in LLMscited by 1
- 2026A Calibrated Reflection Approach for Enhancing Confidence Estimation in LLMs3 Sep 2026
- 2026Are LLMs Positionally Consistent Ordinal Classifiers? A Systematic Evaluation9 Aug 2026
- 2025WebDevJudge: Evaluating (M)LLMs as Critiques for Web Development Quality21 Oct 2025
- 2025Always Tell Me The Odds: Fine-grained Conditional Probability Estimation2 May 2025
- 2025Improving LLM-as-a-Judge Inference with the Judgment Distribution4 Mar 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Group Preference Optimization: Few-Shot Alignment of Large Language Models
- 2024Towards a Unified View of Preference Learning for Large Language Models: A Survey
- 2024Comparing Bad Apples to Good Oranges: Aligning Large Language Models via Joint Preference Optimization
- 2025CAPO: Confidence Aware Preference Optimization Learning for Multilingual Preferences
- 2026Prompt-Dependent Ranking of Large Language Models with Uncertainty Quantification
- 2024CURATRON: Complete and Robust Preference Data for Rigorous Alignment of Large Language Models
- 2025Beyond Pairwise: Empowering LLM Alignment With Ranked Choice Modeling
- 2025Dropping Just a Handful of Preferences Can Change Top Large Language Model Rankings