mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Joint Universal Adversarial Perturbations with Interpretations

arXiv 2408.01715 ↗First posted 3 Aug 2024cs.CR cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Deep neural networks (DNNs) have significantly boosted the performance of many challenging tasks. Despite the great development, DNNs have also exposed their vulnerability. Recent studies have shown that adversaries can manipulate the predictions of DNNs by adding a universal adversarial perturbation (UAP) to benign samples. On the other hand, increasing efforts have been made to help users understand and explain the inner working of DNNs by highlighting the most informative parts (i.e., attribution maps) of samples with respect to their predictions. Moreover, we first empirically find that such attribution maps between benign and adversarial examples have a significant discrepancy, which has the potential to detect universal adversarial perturbations for defending against adversarial attacks. This finding motivates us to further investigate a new research problem: whether there exist universal adversarial perturbations that are able to jointly attack DNNs classifier and its interpretation with malicious desires. It is challenging to give an explicit answer since these two objectives are seemingly conflicting. In this paper, we propose a novel attacking framework to generate joint universal adversarial perturbations (JUAP), which can fool the DNNs model and misguide the inspection from interpreters simultaneously. Comprehensive experiments on various datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method JUAP for joint attacks. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first effort to study UAP for jointly attacking both DNNs and interpretations.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 39 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Aug 2024.

Builds on

39 of 60 references.

References · 39

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,950
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,656
  3. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,336
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,713
  5. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,707
  6. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,515
  7. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,379
  8. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,055
  9. 2016Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolutioncited by 2,687
  10. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,434
  11. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,360
  12. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,316
27 more
  1. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,103
  2. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 938
  3. 2016Universal adversarial perturbationscited by 782
  4. 2023Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmapcited by 666
  5. 2017Interpretable Explanations of Black Boxes by Meaningful Perturbationcited by 611
  6. 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 443
  7. 2023A Survey on Large Language Model (LLM) Security and Privacy: The Good, the Bad, and the Uglycited by 387
  8. 2023On Evaluating Adversarial Robustness of Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 284
  9. 2017Real Time Image Saliency for Black Box Classifierscited by 246
  10. 2019Explanations can be manipulated and geometry is to blamecited by 215
  11. 2021Trustworthy AI: From Principles to Practicescited by 206
  12. 2017Generative Adversarial Perturbationscited by 153
  13. 2020Debugging Tests for Model Explanationscited by 146
  14. 2023Harnessing Explanations: LLM-to-LM Interpreter for Enhanced Text-Attributed Graph Representation Learningcited by 132
  15. 2019Fooling Neural Network Interpretations via Adversarial Model Manipulationcited by 112
  16. 2021Trustworthy AI: A Computational Perspectivecited by 93
  17. 2016Measuring Neural Net Robustness with Constraintscited by 90
  18. 2018Interpretable Deep Learning under Firecited by 74
  19. 2021Explanation-Based Human Debugging of NLP Models: A Surveycited by 53
  20. 2017NAG: Network for Adversary Generationcited by 51
  21. 2023Adversarial attacks and defenses in explainable artificial intelligence: A surveycited by 48
  22. 2020FIND: Human-in-the-Loop Debugging Deep Text Classifierscited by 40
  23. 2022A Comprehensive Survey on Trustworthy Recommender Systemscited by 32
  24. 2023A Survey of Robustness and Safety of 2D and 3D Deep Learning Models Against Adversarial Attackscited by 19
  25. 2024Trustworthy Distributed AI Systems: Robustness, Privacy, and Governancecited by 13
  26. 2022On the Robustness of Bayesian Neural Networks to Adversarial Attackscited by 12
  27. 2019Fast-UAP: An Algorithm for Speeding up Universal Adversarial Perturbation Generation with Orientation of Perturbation Vectorscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.