Dancing in Chains: Reconciling Instruction Following and Faithfulness in Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Modern language models (LMs) need to follow human instructions while being faithful; yet, they often fail to achieve both. Here, we provide concrete evidence of a trade-off between instruction following (i.e., follow open-ended instructions) and faithfulness (i.e., ground responses in given context) when training LMs with these objectives. For instance, fine-tuning LLaMA-7B on instruction following datasets renders it less faithful. Conversely, instruction-tuned Vicuna-7B shows degraded performance at following instructions when further optimized on tasks that require contextual grounding. One common remedy is multi-task learning (MTL) with data mixing, yet it remains far from achieving a synergic outcome. We propose a simple yet effective method that relies on Rejection Sampling for Continued Self-instruction Tuning (ReSet), which significantly outperforms vanilla MTL. Surprisingly, we find that less is more, as training ReSet with high-quality, yet substantially smaller data (three-fold less) yields superior results. Our findings offer a better understanding of objective discrepancies in alignment training of LMs.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2024.
Builds on
30 of 47 references.
References · 30
- 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
- 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
- 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
- 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
- 2017Deep reinforcement learning from human preferencescited by 3,846
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,205
- 2022Language Models (Mostly) Know What They Knowcited by 1,783
- 2016MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Datasetcited by 1,591
- 2015Teaching Machines to Read and Comprehendcited by 1,039
- 2022Atlas: Few-shot Learning with Retrieval Augmented Language Modelscited by 940
18 more
- 2022Super-NaturalInstructions: Generalization via Declarative Instructions on 1600+ NLP Taskscited by 858
- 2016Abstractive Text Summarization Using Sequence-to-Sequence RNNs and Beyondcited by 809
- 2023DSPy: Compiling Declarative Language Model Calls into Self-Improving Pipelinescited by 803
- 2023Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?cited by 729
- 2023OpenAssistant Conversations -- Democratizing Large Language Model Alignmentcited by 712
- 2021Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructionscited by 696
- 2021SummaC: Re-Visiting NLI-based Models for Inconsistency Detection in Summarizationcited by 402
- 2020Multi-Task Learning with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 374
- 2019Multi-Task Deep Neural Networks for Natural Language Understandingcited by 349
- 2018Generating Wikipedia by Summarizing Long Sequencescited by 333
- 2021Understanding Dataset Difficulty with V-Usable Informationcited by 288
- 2021QAFactEval: Improved QA-Based Factual Consistency Evaluation for Summarizationcited by 233
- 2023Survey on Factuality in Large Language Models: Knowledge, Retrieval and Domain-Specificitycited by 204
- 2022On the Origin of Hallucinations in Conversational Models: Is it the Datasets or the Models?cited by 137
- 2024A Closer Look at the Limitations of Instruction Tuningcited by 76
- 2021Increasing Faithfulness in Knowledge-Grounded Dialogue with Controllable Featurescited by 74
- 2019Inoculation by Fine-Tuning: A Method for Analyzing Challenge Datasetscited by 41
- 2021Hindsight: Posterior-guided training of retrievers for improved open-ended generationcited by 38
Built on by
Not cited yet.