mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

From Feature Importance to Natural Language Explanations Using LLMs with RAG

arXiv 2407.20990 ↗First posted 30 Jul 2024cs.AI cs.CL cs.CVcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As machine learning becomes increasingly integral to autonomous decision-making processes involving human interaction, the necessity of comprehending the model's outputs through conversational means increases. Most recently, foundation models are being explored for their potential as post hoc explainers, providing a pathway to elucidate the decision-making mechanisms of predictive models. In this work, we introduce traceable question-answering, leveraging an external knowledge repository to inform the responses of Large Language Models (LLMs) to user queries within a scene understanding task. This knowledge repository comprises contextual details regarding the model's output, containing high-level features, feature importance, and alternative probabilities. We employ subtractive counterfactual reasoning to compute feature importance, a method that entails analysing output variations resulting from decomposing semantic features. Furthermore, to maintain a seamless conversational flow, we integrate four key characteristics - social, causal, selective, and contrastive - drawn from social science research on human explanations into a single-shot prompt, guiding the response generation process. Our evaluation demonstrates that explanations generated by the LLMs encompassed these elements, indicating its potential to bridge the gap between complex model outputs and natural language expressions.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2024.

Builds on

16 of 48 references.

References · 16

  1. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  2. 2014Neural Machine Translation by Jointly Learning to Align and Translatecited by 4,530
  3. 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,210
  4. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  5. 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,185
  6. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
  7. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  8. 2017Explanation in Artificial Intelligence: Insights from the Social Sciencescited by 1,201
  9. 2023A Survey on Multimodal Large Language Models for Autonomous Drivingcited by 288
  10. 2023Driving with LLMs: Fusing Object-Level Vector Modality for Explainable Autonomous Drivingcited by 231
  11. 2020Explaining by Removing: A Unified Framework for Model Explanationcited by 218
  12. 2021Post-hoc Interpretability for Neural NLP: A Surveycited by 155
4 more
  1. 2020Reliable Post hoc Explanations: Modeling Uncertainty in Explainabilitycited by 125
  2. 2016A Survey of Semantic Segmentationcited by 30
  3. 2023Explainability in AI Policies: A Critical Review of Communications, Reports, Regulations, and Standards in the EU, US, and UKcited by 13
  4. 2022From Spoken Thoughts to Automated Driving Commentary: Predicting and Explaining Intelligent Vehicles' Actionscited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.

5 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Can Large Language Models Explain Themselves? A Study of LLM-Generated Self-Explanations
  2. 2023XplainLLM: A Knowledge-Augmented Dataset for Reliable Grounded Explanations in LLMs
  3. 2024Rethinking Interpretability in the Era of Large Language Models
  4. 2023In-Context Explainers: Harnessing LLMs for Explaining Black Box Models
  5. 2026What LLMs explain is not what they believe: Evaluating explanation sufficiency under models' own input beliefs
  6. 2026Not All Explanations Simulate Equally: Comparing Verbalized Feature Attributions and Self-Generated Rationales
  7. 2025Aligning What LLMs Do and Say: Towards Self-Consistent Explanations
  8. 2024Hierarchical Deconstruction of LLM Reasoning: A Graph-Based Framework for Analyzing Knowledge Utilization