mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Faithful and Plausible Natural Language Explanations for Image Classification: A Pipeline Approach

arXiv 2407.20899 ↗First posted 30 Jul 2024cs.AI cs.CLcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Existing explanation methods for image classification struggle to provide faithful and plausible explanations. This paper addresses this issue by proposing a post-hoc natural language explanation method that can be applied to any CNN-based classifier without altering its training process or affecting predictive performance. By analysing influential neurons and the corresponding activation maps, the method generates a faithful description of the classifier's decision process in the form of a structured meaning representation, which is then converted into text by a language model. Through this pipeline approach, the generated explanations are grounded in the neural network architecture, providing accurate insight into the classification process while remaining accessible to non-experts. Experimental results show that the NLEs constructed by our method are significantly more plausible and faithful. In particular, user interventions in the neural network structure (masking of neurons) are three times more effective than the baselines.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2024.

Builds on

22 of 36 references.

References · 22

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  4. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  5. 2015Show, Attend and Tell: Neural Image Caption Generation with Visual Attentioncited by 1,421
  6. 2018RISE: Randomized Input Sampling for Explanation of Black-box Modelscited by 825
  7. 2018This Looks Like That: Deep Learning for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 731
  8. 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 703
  9. 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 590
  10. 2020Captum: A unified and generic model interpretability library for PyTorchcited by 542
  11. 2018e-SNLI: Natural Language Inference with Natural Language Explanationscited by 468
  12. 2018Textual Explanations for Self-Driving Vehiclescited by 226
10 more
  1. 2020Measuring Association Between Labels and Free-Text Rationalescited by 159
  2. 2016Generating Visual Explanationscited by 156
  3. 2022Natural Language Descriptions of Deep Visual Featurescited by 136
  4. 2023Faithfulness Tests for Natural Language Explanationscited by 107
  5. 2018Faithful Multimodal Explanation for Visual Question Answeringcited by 64
  6. 2022NLX-GPT: A Model for Natural Language Explanations in Vision and Vision-Language Taskscited by 60
  7. 2020Natural Language Rationales with Full-Stack Visual Reasoning: From Pixels to Semantic Frames to Commonsense Graphscited by 46
  8. 2022Explaining Chest X-ray Pathologies in Natural Languagecited by 27
  9. 2021Comprehensible Convolutional Neural Networks via Guided Concept Learningcited by 11
  10. 2023The Problem of Coherence in Natural Language Explanations of Recommendationscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 5.

7 papers.