mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Problem of Coherence in Natural Language Explanations of Recommendations

arXiv 2312.11356 ↗First posted 18 Dec 2023cs.CL cs.AI cs.IRcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Providing natural language explanations for recommendations is particularly useful from the perspective of a non-expert user. Although several methods for providing such explanations have recently been proposed, we argue that an important aspect of explanation quality has been overlooked in their experimental evaluation. Specifically, the coherence between generated text and predicted rating, which is a necessary condition for an explanation to be useful, is not properly captured by currently used evaluation measures. In this paper, we highlight the issue of explanation and prediction coherence by 1) presenting results from a manual verification of explanations generated by one of the state-of-the-art approaches 2) proposing a method of automatic coherence evaluation 3) introducing a new transformer-based method that aims to produce more coherent explanations than the state-of-the-art approaches 4) performing an experimental evaluation which demonstrates that this method significantly improves the explanation coherence without affecting the other aspects of recommendation performance.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Dec 2023.

Builds on

15 of 33 references.

References · 15

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  5. 2022Survey of Hallucination in Natural Language Generationcited by 2,056
  6. 2014Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classificationcited by 1,124
  7. 2020Towards Faithfully Interpretable NLP Systems: How should we define and evaluate faithfulness?cited by 590
  8. 2022A Contrastive Framework for Neural Text Generationcited by 224
  9. 2018Explainable Recommendation: A Survey and New Perspectivescited by 210
  10. 2019Towards Explainable Artificial Intelligencecited by 106
  11. 2017RUBER: An Unsupervised Method for Automatic Evaluation of Open-Domain Dialog Systemscited by 88
  12. 2022Personalized Prompt Learning for Explainable Recommendationcited by 79
3 more
  1. 2021Personalized Transformer for Explainable Recommendationcited by 58
  2. 2021Validating Label Consistency in NER Data Annotationcited by 7
  3. 2022On Faithfulness and Coherence of Language Explanations for Recommendation Systemscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

4 papers.