Be aware of overfitting by hyperparameter optimization!
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Hyperparameter optimization is very frequently employed in machine learning. However, an optimization of a large space of parameters could result in overfitting of models. In recent studies on solubility prediction the authors collected seven thermodynamic and kinetic solubility datasets from different data sources. They used state-of-the-art graph-based methods and compared models developed for each dataset using different data cleaning protocols and hyperparameter optimization. In our study we showed that hyperparameter optimization did not always result in better models, possibly due to overfitting when using the same statistical measures. Similar results could be calculated using pre-set hyperparameters, reducing the computational effort by around 10,000 times. We also extended the previous analysis by adding a representation learning method based on Natural Language Processing of smiles called Transformer CNN. We show that across all analyzed sets using exactly the same protocol, Transformer CNN provided better results than graph-based methods for 26 out of 28 pairwise comparisons by using only a tiny fraction of time as compared to other methods. Last but not least we stressed the importance of comparing calculation results using exactly the same statistical measures.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Jul 2024.
Builds on
6 of 43 references.
References · 6
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2019Analyzing Learned Molecular Representations for Property Predictioncited by 373
- 2020HEBO Pushing The Limits of Sample-Efficient Hyperparameter Optimisationcited by 81
- 2020BOSS: Bayesian Optimization over String Spacescited by 54
- 2022GAUCHE: A Library for Gaussian Processes in Chemistrycited by 40
- 2020Gaussian Process Molecule Property Prediction with FlowMOcited by 18
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2026Tabular foundation models for in-context prediction of molecular propertiescited by 4
- 2026SCORE: Replacing Layer Stacking with Contractive Recurrent Depthcited by 2
- 2024Development of a Large-scale Dataset of Chest Computed Tomography Reports in Japanese and a High-performance Finding Classification Modelcited by 1
- 2025Bond-Centered Molecular Fingerprint Derivatives: A BBBP Dataset Studycited by 1
- 2025Challenges in Deep Learning-Based Small Organ Segmentation: A Benchmarking Perspective for Medical Research with Limited Datasetscited by 0
- 2026Tabular foundation models for in-context prediction of molecular properties17 Apr 2026
- 2026SCORE: Replacing Layer Stacking with Contractive Recurrent Depth11 Mar 2026
- 2025Bond-Centered Molecular Fingerprint Derivatives: A BBBP Dataset Study6 Oct 2025
- 2025Challenges in Deep Learning-Based Small Organ Segmentation: A Benchmarking Perspective for Medical Research with Limited Datasets7 Sep 2025
- 2024Development of a Large-scale Dataset of Chest Computed Tomography Reports in Japanese and a High-performance Finding Classification Model20 Dec 2024