mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Reproducibility Study of "ITI-GEN: Inclusive Text-to-Image Generation"

arXiv 2407.19996 ↗First posted 29 Jul 2024cs.CV cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Text-to-image generative models often present issues regarding fairness with respect to certain sensitive attributes, such as gender or skin tone. This study aims to reproduce the results presented in "ITI-GEN: Inclusive Text-to-Image Generation" by Zhang et al. (2023a), which introduces a model to improve inclusiveness in these kinds of models. We show that most of the claims made by the authors about ITI-GEN hold: it improves the diversity and quality of generated images, it is scalable to different domains, it has plug-and-play capabilities, and it is efficient from a computational point of view. However, ITI-GEN sometimes uses undesired attributes as proxy features and it is unable to disentangle some pairs of (correlated) attributes such as gender and baldness. In addition, when the number of considered attributes increases, the training time grows exponentially and ITI-GEN struggles to generate inclusive images for all elements in the joint distribution. To solve these issues, we propose using Hard Prompt Search with negative prompting, a method that does not require training and that handles negation better than vanilla Hard Prompt Search. Nonetheless, Hard Prompt Search (with or without negative prompting) cannot be used for continuous attributes that are hard to express in natural language, an area where ITI-GEN excels as it is guided by images during training. Finally, we propose combining ITI-GEN and Hard Prompt Search with negative prompting.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2024.

Builds on

14 of 17 references.

References · 14

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
  3. 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 6,013
  4. 2023Adding Conditional Control to Text-to-Image Diffusion Modelscited by 5,503
  5. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
  6. 2022Exploring CLIP for Assessing the Look and Feel of Imagescited by 991
  7. 2021CogView: Mastering Text-to-Image Generation via Transformerscited by 694
  8. 2019Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learningcited by 521
  9. 2022DALL-Eval: Probing the Reasoning Skills and Social Biases of Text-to-Image Generation Modelscited by 230
  10. 2023Debiasing Vision-Language Models via Biased Promptscited by 149
  11. 2019FairFace: Face Attribute Dataset for Balanced Race, Gender, and Agecited by 87
  12. 2021Aligning Latent and Image Spaces to Connect the Unconnectablecited by 70
2 more
  1. 2023ITI-GEN: Inclusive Text-to-Image Generationcited by 64
  2. 2022Towards Racially Unbiased Skin Tone Estimation via Scene Disambiguationcited by 32

Built on by

Not cited yet.