Configural processing as an optimized strategy for robust object recognition in neural networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Configural processing, the perception of spatial relationships among an object's components, is crucial for object recognition. However, the teleology and underlying neurocomputational mechanisms of such processing are still elusive, notwithstanding decades of research. We hypothesized that processing objects via configural cues provides a more robust means to recognizing them relative to local featural cues. We evaluated this hypothesis by devising identification tasks with composite letter stimuli and comparing different neural network models trained with either only local or configural cues available. We found that configural cues yielded more robust performance to geometric transformations such as rotation or scaling. Furthermore, when both features were simultaneously available, configural cues were favored over local featural cues. Layerwise analysis revealed that the sensitivity to configural cues emerged later relative to local feature cues, possibly contributing to the robustness to pixel-level transformations. Notably, this configural processing occurred in a purely feedforward manner, without the need for recurrent computations. Our findings with letter stimuli were successfully extended to naturalistic face images. Thus, our study provides neurocomputational evidence that configural processing emerges in a na"ive network based on task contingencies, and is beneficial for robust object processing under varying viewing conditions.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jul 2024.
Builds on
13 of 65 references.
References · 13
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2017Prototypical Networks for Few-shot Learningcited by 3,001
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
- 2015Convolutional LSTM Network: A Machine Learning Approach for Precipitation Nowcastingcited by 1,428
- 2021Intriguing Properties of Vision Transformerscited by 446
- 2021Towards Robust Vision Transformercited by 137
- 2021Are Convolutional Neural Networks or Transformers more like human vision?cited by 109
- 2014Deep Neural Networks Reveal a Gradient in the Complexity of Neural Representations across the Brain's Ventral Visual Pathwaycited by 93
- 2019Brain-Like Object Recognition with High-Performing Shallow Recurrent ANNscited by 90
- 2020Unsupervised deep learning identifies semantic disentanglement in single inferotemporal neuronscited by 33
- 2018Deep Convolutional Neural Networks in the Face of Caricature: Identity and Image Revealedcited by 16
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.