Neurosymbolic AI for Enhancing Instructability in Generative AI
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Generative AI, especially via Large Language Models (LLMs), has transformed content creation across text, images, and music, showcasing capabilities in following instructions through prompting, largely facilitated by instruction tuning. Instruction tuning is a supervised fine-tuning method where LLMs are trained on datasets formatted with specific tasks and corresponding instructions. This method systematically enhances the model's ability to comprehend and execute the provided directives. Despite these advancements, LLMs still face challenges in consistently interpreting complex, multi-step instructions and generalizing them to novel tasks, which are essential for broader applicability in real-world scenarios. This article explores why neurosymbolic AI offers a better path to enhance the instructability of LLMs. We explore the use a symbolic task planner to decompose high-level instructions into structured tasks, a neural semantic parser to ground these tasks into executable actions, and a neuro-symbolic executor to implement these actions while dynamically maintaining an explicit representation of state. We also seek to show that neurosymbolic approach enhances the reliability and context-awareness of task execution, enabling LLMs to dynamically interpret and respond to a wider range of instructional contexts with greater precision and flexibility.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jul 2024.
Builds on
10 of 16 references.
References · 10
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2024TravelPlanner: A Benchmark for Real-World Planning with Language Agentscited by 392
- 2023The False Promise of Imitating Proprietary LLMscited by 263
- 2023Do Models Really Learn to Follow Instructions? An Empirical Study of Instruction Tuningcited by 49
- 2024On the Prospects of Incorporating Large Language Models (LLMs) in Automated Planning and Scheduling (APS)cited by 40
- 2023Understanding the Capabilities of Large Language Models for Automated Planningcited by 34
- 2022Process Knowledge-Infused AI: Towards User-level Explainability, Interpretability, and Safetycited by 18
- 2023Building Trustworthy NeuroSymbolic AI Systems: Consistency, Reliability, Explainability, and Safetycited by 14
- 2024Grounding from an AI and Cognitive Science Lenscited by 6
- 2024The Case for Developing a Foundation Model for Planning-like Tasks from Scratchcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.
3 papers.
- 2025Towards Alignment-Centric Paradigm: A Survey of Instruction Tuning in Large Language Modelscited by 5
- 2025NeuroLit Navigator: A Neurosymbolic Approach to Scholarly Article Searches for Systematic Reviewscited by 0
- 2025Model-Grounded Symbolic Artificial Intelligence Systems Learning and Reasoning with Model-Grounded Symbolic Artificial Intelligence Systemscited by 0
- 2025Towards Alignment-Centric Paradigm: A Survey of Instruction Tuning in Large Language Models24 Aug 2025
- 2025Model-Grounded Symbolic Artificial Intelligence Systems Learning and Reasoning with Model-Grounded Symbolic Artificial Intelligence Systems14 Jul 2025
- 2025NeuroLit Navigator: A Neurosymbolic Approach to Scholarly Article Searches for Systematic Reviews1 Mar 2025