Scalable Graph Compressed Convolutions
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Designing effective graph neural networks (GNNs) with message passing has two fundamental challenges, i.e., determining optimal message-passing pathways and designing local aggregators. Previous methods of designing optimal pathways are limited with information loss on the input features. On the other hand, existing local aggregators generally fail to extract multi-scale features and approximate diverse operators under limited parameter scales. In contrast to these methods, Euclidean convolution has been proven as an expressive aggregator, making it a perfect candidate for GNN construction. However, the challenges of generalizing Euclidean convolution to graphs arise from the irregular structure of graphs. To bridge the gap between Euclidean space and graph topology, we propose a differentiable method that applies permutations to calibrate input graphs for Euclidean convolution. The permutations constrain all nodes in a row regardless of their input order and therefore enable the flexible generalization of Euclidean convolution to graphs. Based on the graph calibration, we propose the Compressed Convolution Network (CoCN) for hierarchical graph representation learning. CoCN follows local feature-learning and global parameter-sharing mechanisms of convolution neural networks. The whole model can be trained end-to-end, with compressed convolution applied to learn individual node features and their corresponding structure features. CoCN can further borrow successful practices from Euclidean convolution, including residual connection and inception mechanism. We validate CoCN on both node-level and graph-level benchmarks. CoCN achieves superior performance over competitive GNN baselines. Codes are available at https://github.com/sunjss/CoCN.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 79 of its 99 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jul 2024.
Builds on
79 of 99 references.
References · 79
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,282
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,284
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,355
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
- 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,414
- 2016Convolutional Neural Networks on Graphs with Fast Localized Spectral Filteringcited by 2,085
- 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,571
- 2019Simplifying Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,470
38 more
- 2013Spectral Networks and Locally Connected Networks on Graphscited by 1,097
- 2018Pitfalls of Graph Neural Network Evaluationcited by 994
- 2018Predict then Propagate: Graph Neural Networks meet Personalized PageRankcited by 987
- 2019Strategies for Pre-training Graph Neural Networkscited by 964
- 2018Weisfeiler and Leman Go Neural: Higher-order Graph Neural Networkscited by 878
- 2020Simple and Deep Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 857
- 2018Link Prediction Based on Graph Neural Networkscited by 829
- 2020Geom-GCN: Geometric Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 821
- 2018Hierarchical Graph Representation Learning with Differentiable Poolingcited by 786
- 2020TUDataset: A collection of benchmark datasets for learning with graphscited by 718
- 2019DropEdge: Towards Deep Graph Convolutional Networks on Node Classificationcited by 679
- 2020Benchmarking Graph Neural Networkscited by 672
- 2020On the Bottleneck of Graph Neural Networks and its Practical Implicationscited by 624
- 2020Adaptive Universal Generalized PageRank Graph Neural Networkcited by 592
- 2019Measuring and Relieving the Over-smoothing Problem for Graph Neural Networks from the Topological Viewcited by 544
- 2019Multi-scale Attributed Node Embeddingcited by 543
- 2019DeepGCNs: Can GCNs Go as Deep as CNNs?cited by 527
- 2019Graph U-Netscited by 489
- 2021Understanding over-squashing and bottlenecks on graphs via curvaturecited by 471
- 2019MixHop: Higher-Order Graph Convolutional Architectures via Sparsified Neighborhood Mixingcited by 442
- 2019Self-Attention Graph Poolingcited by 421
- 2019Provably Powerful Graph Networkscited by 385
- 2015Learning Deconvolution Network for Semantic Segmentationcited by 365
- 2021Beyond Low-frequency Information in Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 361
- 2017Residual Gated Graph ConvNetscited by 341
- 2023A critical look at the evaluation of GNNs under heterophily: Are we really making progress?cited by 332
- 2021Graph Neural Networks with Learnable Structural and Positional Representationscited by 326
- 2021Do Transformers Really Perform Bad for Graph Representation?cited by 318
- 2016Learning Convolutional Neural Networks for Graphscited by 314
- 2021Large Scale Learning on Non-Homophilous Graphs: New Benchmarks and Strong Simple Methodscited by 309
- 2021GRAND: Graph Neural Diffusioncited by 258
- 2022Long Range Graph Benchmarkcited by 258
- 2020How Neural Networks Extrapolate: From Feedforward to Graph Neural Networkscited by 218
- 2020The Surprising Power of Graph Neural Networks with Random Node Initializationcited by 190
- 2021Two Sides of the Same Coin: Heterophily and Oversmoothing in Graph Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 182
- 2022How Powerful are Spectral Graph Neural Networkscited by 169
- 2022Revisiting Heterophily For Graph Neural Networkscited by 169
- 2023On Over-Squashing in Message Passing Neural Networks: The Impact of Width, Depth, and Topologycited by 163
50 most cited of 79 All 79 (JSON)
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.
2 papers.