mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Quadratic Advantage with Quantum Randomized Smoothing Applied to Time-Series Analysis

arXiv 2407.18021 ↗First posted 25 Jul 2024quant-ph cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As quantum machine learning continues to develop at a rapid pace, the importance of ensuring the robustness and efficiency of quantum algorithms cannot be overstated. Our research presents an analysis of quantum randomized smoothing, how data encoding and perturbation modeling approaches can be matched to achieve meaningful robustness certificates. By utilizing an innovative approach integrating Grover's algorithm, a quadratic sampling advantage over classical randomized smoothing is achieved. This strategy necessitates a basis state encoding, thus restricting the space of meaningful perturbations. We show how constrained k-distant Hamming weight perturbations are a suitable noise distribution here, and elucidate how they can be constructed on a quantum computer. The efficacy of the proposed framework is demonstrated on a time series classification task employing a Bag-of-Words pre-processing solution. The advantage of quadratic sample reduction is recovered especially in the regime with large number of samples. This may allow quantum computers to efficiently scale randomized smoothing to more complex tasks beyond the reach of classical methods.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2024.

Builds on

21 of 36 references.

References · 21

  1. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  2. 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,324
  3. 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 739
  4. 2017Evasion Attacks against Machine Learning at Test Timecited by 686
  5. 2020The power of quantum neural networkscited by 377
  6. 2019Provably Robust Deep Learning via Adversarially Trained Smoothed Classifierscited by 328
  7. 2016Quantum Machine Learningcited by 325
  8. 2018On the Effectiveness of Interval Bound Propagation for Training Verifiably Robust Modelscited by 322
  9. 2023Challenges and Opportunities in Quantum Machine Learningcited by 202
  10. 2020Quantum noise protects quantum classifiers against adversariescited by 68
  11. 2019Tight Certificates of Adversarial Robustness for Randomly Smoothed Classifierscited by 65
  12. 2019Quantum Adversarial Machine Learningcited by 64
9 more
  1. 2022Benchmarking Adversarially Robust Quantum Machine Learning at Scalecited by 28
  2. 2024Provably Robust Conformal Prediction with Improved Efficiencycited by 27
  3. 2020Optimal Provable Robustness of Quantum Classification via Quantum Hypothesis Testingcited by 23
  4. 2020Robustness Verification of Quantum Classifierscited by 18
  5. 2022Certified Robustness of Quantum Classifiers against Adversarial Examples through Quantum Noisecited by 17
  6. 2024Predominant Aspects on Security for Quantum Machine Learning: Literature Reviewcited by 9
  7. 2022Verifying Fairness in Quantum Machine Learningcited by 7
  8. 2023Efficient MILP Decomposition in Quantum Computing for ReLU Network Robustnesscited by 4
  9. 2019Deterministic Preparation of Dicke Statescited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.