mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Verifying Fairness in Quantum Machine Learning

arXiv 2207.11173 ↗First posted 22 Jul 2022quant-ph cs.CY cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Due to the beyond-classical capability of quantum computing, quantum machine learning is applied independently or embedded in classical models for decision making, especially in the field of finance. Fairness and other ethical issues are often one of the main concerns in decision making. In this work, we define a formal framework for the fairness verification and analysis of quantum machine learning decision models, where we adopt one of the most popular notions of fairness in the literature based on the intuition -- any two similar individuals must be treated similarly and are thus unbiased. We show that quantum noise can improve fairness and develop an algorithm to check whether a (noisy) quantum machine learning model is fair. In particular, this algorithm can find bias kernels of quantum data (encoding individuals) during checking. These bias kernels generate infinitely many bias pairs for investigating the unfairness of the model. Our algorithm is designed based on a highly efficient data structure -- Tensor Networks -- and implemented on Google's TensorFlow Quantum. The utility and effectiveness of our algorithm are confirmed by the experimental results, including income prediction and credit scoring on real-world data, for a class of random (noisy) quantum decision models with 27 qubits (227-dimensional state space) tripling (218 times more than) that of the state-of-the-art algorithms for verifying quantum machine learning models.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2022.

Builds on

14 of 53 references.

References · 14

  1. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  2. 2020Variational Quantum Algorithmscited by 687
  3. 2019Explaining Machine Learning Classifiers through Diverse Counterfactual Explanationscited by 612
  4. 2019Efficient and Accurate Estimation of Lipschitz Constants for Deep Neural Networkscited by 290
  5. 2019Efficient Learning for Deep Quantum Neural Networkscited by 160
  6. 2019On the Apparent Conflict Between Individual and Group Fairnesscited by 126
  7. 2016Quantum Recommendation Systemscited by 69
  8. 2020Quantum noise protects quantum classifiers against adversariescited by 68
  9. 2020Verifying Individual Fairness in Machine Learning Modelscited by 49
  10. 2018Probabilistic Verification of Fairness Properties via Concentrationcited by 45
  11. 2020Justicia: A Stochastic SAT Approach to Formally Verify Fairnesscited by 25
  12. 2020Optimal Provable Robustness of Quantum Classification via Quantum Hypothesis Testingcited by 23
2 more
  1. 2019TensorNetwork: A Library for Physics and Machine Learningcited by 21
  2. 2020Robustness Verification of Quantum Classifierscited by 18

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 3.

7 papers.